Analisa Penyebab Kegagalan Proyek Ditinjau dari kinerja Waktu, Biaya, dan Mutu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5458Keywords:
Construction management; Time performance; Cost overrun; Quality performanceAbstract
The success of construction projects is commonly assessed by achieving time, cost, and quality targets, whereas failure appears as delays, cost overruns, and noncompliance with technical specifications. Based on construction project management concepts and the time–cost–quality trade-off, this study aims to identify factors influencing the risk of failing to achieve time, cost, and quality objectives in construction projects located in Samarinda City, Kutai Barat Regency, and Mahakam Ulu Regency, and to determine the most dominant factor. A descriptive approach with a survey method was applied to 36 respondents selected using random sampling. The independent variables comprise time, cost, and quality performance, while the dependent variable is project failure. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using Pearson validity tests, Cronbach’s Alpha reliability tests, and percentage calculations of each aspect’s contribution. The results indicate that all items of time (7 items), cost (13 items), and quality (6 items) performance are valid, with correlation coefficients exceeding the critical value of 0.329 and significance levels below 0.05, and reliable, with alpha values of 0.821, 0.901, and 0.849, respectively. The analysis of failure factors reveals that the cost aspect is the most dominant contributor at 50%, followed by quality at 44%, while time contributes 36%. These findings emphasize the need to prioritise budget control and quality assurance systems, supported by effective time management, to reduce the risk of construction project failure in East Kalimantan.
Downloads
References
S. Iqbal, M. J. Nawaz, A. Hamza, H. A. Khan, M. M. Butt, and A. Maqsood, “Analyzing The Causes of Project Failure and Cost Overruns in Building Construction Industry by Using a Mixed-Methods Approach,” Pakistan J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1898–1916, 2024, doi: 10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i2.2311.
F. A. Suryawinata, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Cost Overruns Proyek Konstruksi Gedung: Kajian Literatur Sistematis,” J. Sustain. Constr., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 2024, doi: 10.26593/josc.v4i1.8157.
A. Suryaningrum, H. Rudianto, A. Mahmudi, and E. Prasetyo, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Menggunakan Metode Fault Tree Analysis (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Office Headquarter Surabaya),” Inter Tech, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–29, 2024, doi: 10.54732/i.v2i1.1104.
S. Sutikno, Y. Kurniawan, D. D. Hartono, and H. H. Purba, “Identifikasi Risiko Keselamatan Pada Proyek Konstruksi: Kajian Literatur,” J. Teknol. dan Manaj., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 13–22, 2021, doi: 10.52330/jtm.v19i2.28.
Carlos Alexandro Putra Atmaja and Hanie Teki Tjendani, “Analisis Faktor Keterlambatan Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Lingkar Selatan Kabupaten Sampang Dengan Metode Fault Tree Analysis,” J. Sci. Res. Dev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 954–968, 2024, doi: 10.56670/jsrd.v5i2.276.
A. J. Nahumarury, R. Serang, and M. Abdin, “Pengaruh Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Terhadap Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Ruang Kelas Baru (RKB) Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri 5 Maluku Tengah,” J. Agreg., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal-polnam.ac.id/index.php/JA/article/download/1955/1051
E. Widodo, “Tinjauan Penjadwalan dan Pengendalian Proyek Melalui Time Schedule pada Proyek,” RekaRacana J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 11, no. 02, pp. 127–133, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v10i2.
D. Pradita and M. Ronald Adventus Simanjuntak, “Analisis Estimasi Penyelesaian Proyek Konstruksi terhadap Waktu dan Biaya,” Pros. TAU SNARS-TEK Semin. Nas. Rekayasa dan Teknol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 127–134, 2024, doi: 10.47970/snarstek.v2i1.600.
H. Agusta, G. A. Shakti, and R. Mulyani, “Peningkatan Mutu Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Dengan Metode Siklus Pdca,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3089–2163, 2025.
Republik Indonesia, “Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Jasa Konstruksi,” Penyelenggaraan Jasa Konstr., pp. 1–69, 2000.
S. A. Rendjani, W. N. E. Rini, and O. L. S, “Analisis Risiko Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja pada Proyek Pembangunan Filtrasi Air Sumur Dalam,” PubHealth J. Kesehat. Masy., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 216–230, 2025, doi: 10.56211/pubhealth.v4i2.1260.
N. Nurhayati, B. Anif, and H. Heldi, “Faktor Keterlambatan Pekerjaan Pembangunan Gedung Pada Kabupaten Sijunjung,” Sigma Tek., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 410–419, 2024, doi: 10.33373/sigmateknika.v7i2.6711.
R. Ali, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Mutu Pelaksanaan Proyek Peningkatan Jalan Tedubara-Pising Kabupaten Bombana,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 2022.
M. Natalia and J. Atmaja, “Optimalisasi Waktu dan Biaya dengan Metode Time Cost Trade Off Pada Proyek Konstruksi Jalan,” J. Ilm. Poli Rekayasa, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 1, 2021, doi: 10.30630/jipr.17.1.208.
L. D. Holis and Y. Wijaya, “Survey Terhadap Keputusan Kontraktor Di Surabaya,” Dimens. Pratama Tek. Sipil, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 156–163, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Rio, Findia Findia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





