Reaktualisasi Konsep Recht Idee Gustav Radbruch Sebagai Fondasi Hukum Progresif Indonesia

Adiansyah Adiansyah; Abdul Kadir Jailani; Hendra Darmawan; Erdy Nopriady; Delima Santri; A. Jabidi Ritonga

doi:10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5137

Authors

Adiansyah Adiansyah Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Abdul Kadir Jailani Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Hendra Darmawan Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Erdy Nopriady Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Delima Santri Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
A. Jabidi Ritonga Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5137

Keywords:

Recht Idee, Penegakan Hukum, Teori Hukum, Keadilan

Abstract

The problem of law enforcement in Indonesia, which is still stuck in a formalistic approach, shows the need for a strong philosophical foundation to support progressive law. This study examines how Gustav Radbruch's concept of recht idee can be reactivated as the foundation of progressive law in Indonesia. Using normative legal research methods with a philosophical and conceptual approach, this study analyzes the relationship between Radbruch's thinking on the three basic values of law, namely justice, utility, and legal certainty, with Satjipto Rahardjo's ideas on progressive law. Radbruch developed the principle of priority, which allows justice to take precedence when it conflicts with legal certainty, even stating that natural law can override positive law if it contradicts fundamental justice. This thinking is in line with progressive law, which rejects the deification of legal texts and prioritizes substantive justice. The results of the study show that the reactivation of Radbruch's concept of recht idee provides philosophical legitimacy for progressive legal breakthroughs and strengthens the theoretical basis for breaking free from the shackles of formalism. Thus, the Indonesian legal system can realize laws that are truly fair and beneficial to society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afdhali, D. R., & Syahuri, T. (2023). Idealitas Penegakkan Hukum Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Teori Tujuan Hukum. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 6(2), 555-561.

Al'anam, M. (2025). Teori Keadilan Perspektif Gustav Radbruch: Hubungan Moral Dan Hukum.

Alexy, R. (2004). The nature of legal philosophy. Ratio juris, 17(2), 156-167.

Ali, A. (1996). Menguak Tabir Hukum. Jakarta: Chandra Pratama.

Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, urgensi, dan relevansi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 159-185.

Beranda Hukum. (2024). Teori Hukum Progresif (Satjipto Rahardjo). Diakses dari https://berandahukum.com

Dandapala. (2024). Pemikiran Satjipto Rahardjo: Jejak Sejarah Hukum Progresif di Indonesia. Diakses dari https://dandapala.com

Dhikshita, I. B. G. P. A. (2020). Manifestasi Teori Tujuan Hukum Gustav Radbruch dan Mazhab Positivisme di Indonesia. Advokat Konstitusi. https://advokatkonstitusi.com

Muslih, M. (2017). Negara hukum Indonesia dalam perspektif teori hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga nilai dasar hukum). Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 130-152.

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Yamani, R. R. (2016). Pemikiran Prof. Satjipto Rahardjo Tentang Hukum Progresif Dan Relevansinya Dengan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar.