Netnografi Humor Percakapan dalam Komunikasi Kesehatan Mental di YouTube
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v4i4.7159Keywords:
conversational humor, digital health communication, mental health, netnography, YouTubeAbstract
Digital mental health communication increasingly takes the form of informal conversations between health professionals and podcast hosts. In such interactions, humor may emerge spontaneously rather than as a planned communication strategy, raising questions about how audiences interpret its appropriateness and communicative value. This study explores how audiences interpret conversational humor in mental health communication on YouTube and how such humor is negotiated within interactions between a health professional and a podcast host. Using a qualitative netnographic approach, the study analyzed comments on the YouTube video Buat yang Lagi Stres, featuring podcast host Raditya Dika and psychiatrist Elvine Gunawan. From an initial corpus of 1,043 main comments, 123 comments were selected through contextual screening and analyzed using Schreier’s qualitative content analysis. Symbolic interactionism theory was used to examine how audiences construct and negotiate meanings surrounding humor through their interpretations of the interaction between both speakers. The findings show that conversational humor is understood not merely through jokes but through the interactional context in which humor emerges, including spontaneity, differences in humor style, interpersonal dynamics, and expectations regarding professionalism and topic sensitivity. Humor may make mental health communication feel more approachable, yet audiences continue to evaluate its relevance, accuracy, and appropriateness. From a symbolic interactionist perspective, audiences act as negotiators of the meanings and boundaries of acceptable humor. Conversational humor in digital mental health communication should thus be understood as a contextual, interactional, and audience-dependent communicative practice rather than a universally effective message strategy.
Downloads
References
Attardo, Salvatore, and Béatrice Priego-Valverde. 2026. “Conversational Humor as an Emergent Property of Context.” Discourse Studies 28 (3): 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456251369994.
Avella, H. 2024. “Influencer Economies, ‘Uber Therapies,’ and Platformed Pathologies: Mental Health Diagnosis and Sponsored TikTok Content.” Information, Communication & Society: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2024.2434638.
Berlo, David K. 1960. The Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brigaud, E., A. Lafont, and N. Blanc. 2021. “Your Eyes Do Not Lie! Dissecting Humor Effects in Health Messages Using Eye Tracker Technology.” Frontiers in Public Health 9: 653584. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2021.653584.
Droog, E., C. Burgers, D. van Huijstee, and I. Vermeulen. 2025. “Laughing Through the Myths: Using Satirical Humor to Counter Misinformation About Contraceptives on Social Media.” Health Communication: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2560034.
Efendi, E., F. Fadila, K. Tariq, T. Pratama, and W. Azmi. 2024. “Interaksionisme Simbolik dan Prakmatis.” Da’watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting 4 (3): 1088–1095. https://doi.org/10.47467/dawatuna.v4i3.514.
Fletcher, James. 2023. “Symbolic Interactionism.” In Encyclopedia of Health Research in the Social Sciences, edited by Kevin Dew and Sarah Donovan, 320–325. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885691.ch58.
Galea, G., R. Chugh, and L. Mainey. 2025. “Funny or Risky? Humour in Health-Related Social Media.” Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 15 (2): e202520. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16312.
Hu, Yangna, Cindy Sing Bik Ngai, and Alex Chun Koon. 2026. “Humor in Social Media Health Communication: A Systematic Review of Strategic Uses and Effects.” Behavioral Sciences 16 (4): 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040509.
Iles, I. A., and X. Nan. 2017. “It’s No Laughing Matter: An Exploratory Study of the Use of Ironic versus Sarcastic Humor in Health-Related Advertising Messages.” Health Marketing Quarterly 34 (3): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2017.1346432.
Jiang, Tonglin, Hao Li, and Yubo Hou. 2019. “Cultural Differences in Humor Perception, Usage, and Implications.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123.
Limbu, Yam B., Christopher McKinley, and Bruce A. Huhmann. 2026. “Health Message Outcomes of Humor Appeals: A Systematic Review.” Health Communication: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2609216.
Littlejohn, Stephen W., Karen A. Foss, and John G. Oetzel. 2017. Theories of Human Communication. 11th ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Littlejohn, Stephen W., Karen A. Foss, and John G. Oetzel. 2021. Theories of Human Communication. 12th ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Edited by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Motta, M., Y. Liu, and A. Yarnell. 2024. “‘Influencing the Influencers’: A Field Experimental Approach to Promoting Effective Mental Health Communication on TikTok.” Dental Science Reports 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56578-1.
Muhammad Fikri. (2026). Solidarity Beyond Borders: SEAblings and Digital Activism in Southeast Asia. Proceedings.Icesy, 1(01). Retrieved from https://proceedings.icesy.org/index.php/PI/article/view/13
Nabi, R. L. 2016. “Laughing in the Face of Fear (of Disease Detection): Using Humor to Promote Cancer Self-Examination Behavior.” Health Communication 31 (7): 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.1000479.
Naslund, J. A., K. A. Aschbrenner, L. A. Marsch, and S. J. Bartels. 2016. “The Future of Mental Health Care: Peer-to-Peer Support and Social Media.” Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 25 (2): 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001067.
Salzmann-Erikson, M., and H. Eriksson. 2023. “A Mapping Review of Netnography in Nursing.” Qualitative Health Research: 10497323231173794. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231173794.
Samuel, L., K. Kuijpers, and A. Bleakley. 2024. “TherapyTok for Depression and Anxiety: A Quantitative Content Analysis of High Engagement TikTok Videos.” Journal of Adolescent Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.02.002.
Schreier, Margrit. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: SAGE.
Schwabe, J., M. S. Altenmüller, and M. Gollwitzer. 2025. “The Double-Edged Sword of Informality: How Informal Communication Shapes Closeness and Trustworthiness in Personal and Professional Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075251314810.
Siregar, N. S. S. 2016. “Kajian tentang Interaksionisme Simbolik.” Perspektif 1 (2): 100–110. https://doi.org/10.31289/PERSPEKTIF.V1I2.86.
Tsakona, V., and J. Chovanec. 2018. The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/THR.7.
Turan Eroğlu, Dilek. 2025. “Effects of Symbols on Communication Within the Society Via Symbolic Interactionism and the Case of Cem Karaca’s Song.” Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 83: 367–378. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1585316.
Vaz de Almeida, C., and C. Nunes. 2020. “Humor Is Important in Healthcare Relationship? The Perceptions of Doctors and Nurses.” Open Access Library Journal 7 (5): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4236/OALIB.1106372.
Wang, T., and R. L. Pavelko. 2023. “Engaging Audience on Social Media: The Persuasive Impact of Fit Between Humor and Regulatory Focus in Health Messages.” Health Communication: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2218532.
Xu, L., X. Yang, and S. Tian. 2023. “A Study on the Role of Internet Emoticons in Business Communication from the Perspective of Symbolic Interactionism.” Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications 9 (3): 161–184. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.9-3-2.
Yeo, S. K., M. A. Cacciatore, L. Y.-F. Su, M. McKasy, and L. O’Neill. 2021. “Following Science on Social Media: The Effects of Humor and Source Likability.” Public Understanding of Science 30 (5): 963662520986942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520986942.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Fikri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





