Analisis Kelayakan Penggunaan Tameng Bertegangan Rendah dalam Penanganan Konflik Sosial: Kajian Aspek Keselamatan dan Efektivitas pada Kompi 1 Yon B Pelopor Brimob di Kabupaten Sumbawa Besar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i7.6978Keywords:
Feasibility Analysis; Low-Voltage Shield; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); Social Conflict; Brimob; Less-Lethal Equipment; Public Order Control.Abstract
Research on Public Order Control (PHH) shields has generally focused on material strength, impact resistance, and ergonomic design as passive protective equipment. However, studies integrating shatter-resistant materials, high impact resistance, and low-voltage technology into a single protective system to enhance both personnel safety and crowd-control effectiveness remain limited. This research gap indicates the absence of comprehensive investigations evaluating the feasibility of low-voltage shields from the perspectives of user safety, operational effectiveness, and compliance with the Indonesian National Police's (POLRI) use-of-force principles. Therefore, this study examines the feasibility of implementing low-voltage shields for Company 1, Battalion B Pelopor, Mobile Brigade Corps (Brimob), in Sumbawa Besar Regency, with particular emphasis on the shields' ability to provide optimal protection through shatter-resistant materials, superior impact resistance, and a non-lethal low-voltage electric shock mechanism to support safer and more effective social conflict management. This research employs a qualitative-descriptive approach using a case study strategy, with data collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) developed by Davis (1989) is used as the analytical framework with three main constructs: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Actual System Use. The results reveal high levels of perceived usefulness and ease of use among all seven informants, though actual implementation has not yet been carried out due to the absence of specific regulations and standardized testing. The study concludes that low-voltage shields are technically and operationally feasible as an innovative PHH equipment for Brimob personnel in handling social conflicts in Sumbawa Regency, provided that technical standards, SOP formulation, special training, and institutional legalization are fulfilled.
Downloads
References
Arif Rahman. (2021). Penggunaan gas air mata dalam pengendalian massa ditinjau dari aspek HAM. Jurnal Kepolisian Indonesia.
Artajaya, I. W. E. (2025). Pengaturan prosedur dalam penanganan unjuk rasa oleh Brimob. Jurnal Hukum dan Keamanan.
Creswell, J. W. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Harisno Kahfi. (2025). Peranan POLRI dalam penanganan kerusuhan sengketa lahan tanah Register 45. Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara.
Hibrizi, A. R., dkk. (2024). Reorientasi peran Polri dalam penanganan konflik sosial dari perspektif penegakan hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 18(2).
Jandy, M. S. (2026). Peran Brimob dalam penanganan konflik sosial: Pendekatan keamanan versus keadilan restoratif. Jurnal Studi Keamanan, 4(1).
Kahfi, H. (2025). Peranan POLRI dalam penanganan kerusuhan sengketa lahan. Jurnal Administrasi Kepolisian.
Kurniawan, A. S. (2022). Penggunaan kekuatan Brimob dalam pengamanan unjuk rasa berdasarkan Perkap Nomor 1 Tahun 2009. Jurnal Kepolisian, 16(1).
Mifta, & Ariel, M. (2025). Implementasi asas proporsional oleh aparat kepolisian dalam penanganan demonstrasi. Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nugroho, Y. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap anggota Polri dalam tugas penanganan konflik sosial. Jurnal Hukum Kepolisian, 10(2).
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Free Press.
Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penggunaan Kekuatan dalam Tindakan Kepolisian.
Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 tentang Penanggulangan Huru-Hara.
Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2009 tentang Implementasi Prinsip dan Standar HAM dalam Tugas Polri.
Smith, M. R., & Kaminski, R. J. (2007). The impact of conducted energy devices and other types of force and resistance on officer and suspect injuries. Policing: An International Journal, 30(3), 423–446.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sumartias, S., & Rahmat, A. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi konflik sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 16(1), 13–20.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2002 Nomor 2.
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2012 tentang Penanganan Konflik Sosial. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2012 Nomor 116.
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1998 Nomor 181.
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1999 Nomor 165.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arie Prima, Muhamad Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
