Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Pilihan Ganda Tiga Tingkat (Three-Tier Test) Pada Pelajaran PAI di SD Negeri 03 Taman Agung Sumatera Selatan

Authors

  • Apriyadi Apriyadi Universitas Nurul Huda OKU Timur, Indonesia
  • Zainul Hasan Universita Nurul Huda Oku Timur
  • Ade Rosad Universita Nurul Huda Oku Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i7.6955

Keywords:

Diagnostic Assessment, Misconceptions, Islamic Education, Three-Tier Test

Abstract

This study aims to describe the development process and qualitatively analyze the field-testing results of a three-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test instrument in Islamic Education (PAI). The core issue examined is the prevalence of pseudo-high scores caused by guessing techniques and latent misconceptions among students regarding abstract religious concepts. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed. Data were gathered through a combination of the three-tier diagnostic test (15 items), semi-structured interviews, participant classroom observations, and documentation review. Research participants were selected using a purposive sampling technique, comprising 25 fifth-grade students of SD Negeri 03 Taman Agung, South Sumatra, and two senior PAI teachers. Data analysis followed the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The findings revealed major themes, including "Culture-Based Misconceptions and Literalism" in purification (thaharah) materials and "Eschatological Confusion" in the doctrines of the Last Day. This instrument significantly contributes to mapping structured misconceptions that conventional tests fail to detect. In conclusion, the development of this tiered instrument provides practical implications for teachers to design precise remediation and policy implications for reforming diagnostic assessment standards at the elementary school level. Suggestions for future research include expanding the geographical scope of the study and evaluating the effectiveness of post-diagnostic intervention learning models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afandi, A. R., & Handayani, S. (2022). Karakteristik instrumen penilaian diagnostik pada mata pelajaran humaniora di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(3), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i3.46821

Anwar, C., & Huda, N. (2021). Asesmen diagnostik kesulitan belajar pendidikan agama Islam: Pendekatan kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.v10i2.2341

Fauzi, M., & Rahman, A. (2023). Miskonsepsi konsep thaharah pada siswa sekolah dasar: Analisis deskriptif fenomenologi. Jurnal As-Salam, 7(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.37249/as-salam.v7i1.512

Fitriani, N., & Mutmainah, S. (2024). Analisis miskonsepsi materi fikih menggunakan instrumen bertingkat di madrasah ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 9(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.v9i1.15612

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (2020). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2023). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess high school students' conceptual understanding. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(2), 512–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1923514

Mulyadi, A., & Saputra, H. (2021). Penerapan three-tier diagnostic test untuk mereduksi guessing pada ujian pilihan ganda. Jurnal Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.21831/jaep.v9i2.39412

Ramadhan, T., & Lestari, P. (2022). Identifikasi kesulitan belajar PAI siswa sekolah dasar melalui pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Jurnal Elementaria, 5(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.31949/elementaria.v5i2.2104

Sholeh, M., & Wijaya, C. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen tes diagnostik pada materi rumpun Al-Qur'an Hadis di sekolah dasar negeri. Jurnal Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 30(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.30829/tarbiyah.v30i1.2045

Zarkasyi, M., & Fauziah, I. (2025). Analisis kualitatif miskonsepsi keagamaan pada anak usia sekolah dasar di Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 12(1), 89–102.

Arifin, Z. (2020). Evaluasi pembelajaran: Prinsip, teknik, dan prosedur. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2020). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Muhaimin. (2020). Paradigma pendidikan Islam: Upaya mengefektifkan pendidikan agama Islam di sekolah. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Prastowo, A. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam perspektif rancangan penelitian. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Rukin. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Jakad Media Publishing.

Sanjaya, W. (2022). Penelitian evaluatif dalam bidang pendidikan. Kencana.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Suwarto. (2021). Pengembangan tes diagnostik dalam pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Apriyadi, A., Hasan, Z., & Rosad, A. (2026). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Pilihan Ganda Tiga Tingkat (Three-Tier Test) Pada Pelajaran PAI di SD Negeri 03 Taman Agung Sumatera Selatan. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 5(7), 3692–3703. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i7.6955