Implementasi Aplikasi Web Perbandingan Metode Saw dan Topsis dalam Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik

Galuh Saputri; Willis Puspita Sari; Joko Suwarno

doi:10.55681/sentri.v4i9.4420

Authors

Galuh Saputri Universitas Pamulang
Willis Puspita Sari Universitas Pamulang
Joko Suwarno Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v4i9.4420

Keywords:

Web, Supplier, Decision Support System, SAW Method, TOPSIS Method

Abstract

PT. PEB is one of the groups of PT. PBT which is engaged in industry. To support the raw material that is needed by the company, a decision support system is proposed in selecting the best supplier. This study aims to analyze supplier selection and can help provide analysis of suppliers based on the criteria desired by the company, there are 8 criteria, namely low prices, quality goods, timeliness in delivery, availability of goods, good service to customers, delivery time, discounts, and payment due. Then as an alternative, there are 50 suppliers who have collaborated with the company. The selection of the best suppliers was analyzed using the TOPSIS and SAW methods, the results obtained from each method. In the TOPSIS method, CV.AP got the highest score of 0.779 while the SAW method, CV.CH got the highest score of 0.963. Then the results of the calculation program speed of the two methods are also different, the TOPSIS method is completed in 0.0327 seconds and SAW is completed in 0.0371 seconds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Rosyiidi and A. M. Subagyo, “ANALISIS PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER OBAT PADA APOTEK ADINDA MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP),” Ina. J. Ind. Qual. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21–33, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.34010/IQE.V9I1.4316.

A. W. Wardana, S. Maulidah, and A. Aprilia, “Supplier Performance Evaluation on Regular Raw Material Suppliers by Applying AHP and TOPSIS Approaches (Evidence from the Apple Agroindustry),” HABITAT, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 64–73, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.21776/UB.HABITAT.2022.033.1.7.

R. Haris Andri and D. Permana Sitanggang, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan (SPK) Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik Dengan Metode MOORA,” J. Sains Inform. Terap., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 79–84, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.62357/JSIT.V2I3.181.

N. M. Astiti et al., “IMPLEMENTASI METODE CPI DALAM PROSES SELEKSI SUPPLIER TERBAIK DI DUTA ORCHID,” Naratif J. Nas. Riset, Apl. dan Tek. Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–53, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.53580/NARATIF.V5I1.210.

W. A. Maulana, A. Nugroho, and T. Andriyanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Di Toko Bangunan Ragil,” Pros. SEMNAS INOTEK (Seminar Nas. Inov. Teknol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 154–159, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.29407/INOTEK.V5I2.1030.

J. D. Manik, A. R. Samosir, and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting dalam Penerimaan Siswa Magang Pada Universitas Budi Darma,” sudo J. Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51–59, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.56211/SUDO.V1I2.14.

S. A. H. Nasution and S. Sriani, “Implementation of Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) for Selecting the Best Stocks,” SISTEMASI, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 421–435, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.32520/STMSI.V14I1.4935.

G. Susilo, M. A. Machmudi, S. Wahyudiono, K. I. Santoso, and P. M. Informatika, “Implementasi Metode FMADM dan SAW pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penyaluran Bantuan Rumah Tidak Layak Huni,” Go Infotech J. Ilm. STMIK AUB, vol. 30, no. 1, p. HAL. 1-9, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.36309/goi.v30i1.254.

W. Eka Sari and S. Rani, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 52–58, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.32736/SISFOKOM.V10I1.1027.

N. Nurasiah, W. Winanti, and D. Andiyani, “SISTEM INFORMASI PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN SALESMAN TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DI PT. CENTRAL SATRYA PERDANA,” Insa. Pembang. Sist. Inf. dan Komput., vol. 10, no. 2, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.58217/IPSIKOM.V10I2.217.

A. Farichin and M. R. Zakaria, “ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN METODE SAW DAN TOPSIS PADA SISTEM PENUNJANG KEPUTUSAN DALAM PENILAIAN KINERJA KARYAWAN (STUDY KASUS PT SKF INDONESIA),” J. Inform. SIMANTIK, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 70–76, Sep. 2023, Accessed: Aug. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://simantik-panca-sakti.ac.id/index.php/simantik/article/view/104.

M. Yusuf, A.-H. Syah, M. Rudi Sanjaya, E. Lestari, and B. W. Putra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Menerapkan Metode TOPSIS Untuk Menentukan Siswa Terbaik,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 149–154, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.47233/JTEKSIS.V5I2.794.

H. Risandika, S. P. Agustini, B. C. Octariadi, and U. M. Pontianak, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi SMA Islam Swasta Di Kota Pontianak Menggunakan Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS,” J. FASILKOM, vol. 13, no. 02, pp. 151–158, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.37859/JF.V13I02.5178.

M. Maidiana, “Penelitian Survey,” ALACRITY J. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 20–29, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.52121/ALACRITY.V1I2.23.

K. Kurnia, S. Sukardi, L. H. Santoso, and E. A. Darmadi, “Analisa Mengenai Pemilihan Gaya Berpakaian Menggunakan Metode Observasi,” IKRA-ITH Hum. J. Sos. dan Hum., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 150–155, Jul. 2023, Accessed: Aug. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/ikraith-humaniora/article/view/4822.