Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Teknik Pertambangan Menurut Kriteria Watson dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kalkulus Integral

Sastrowijoyo Sastrowijoyo

doi:10.55681/sentri.v4i7.4254

Authors

Sastrowijoyo Sastrowijoyo Universitas Cordova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v4i7.4254

Keywords:

student errors, watson’s criteria, integral calculus

Abstract

This study aims to identify the types of errors made by Mining Engineering students when solving integral calculus problems, based on Watson’s error taxonomy. This research employed a descriptive qualitative approach, with three research subjects selected through purposive sampling. The selection was based on students' varying ability levels, high, medium, and low, and their communication skills in expressing ideas. The findings reveal that students made various types of errors in line with Watson’s criteria. High-ability students made errors such as irrelevant data (id), omitted data (od), and omitted conclusion (oc). Medium-ability students committed errors such as incorrect procedure (ip), unwarranted manipulation (um), and omitted conclusion (oc). Meanwhile, low-ability students made more complex errors, including incorrect procedure (ip), omitted conclusion (oc), response level conflict (rlc), and skills hierarchy problem (shp). Factors contributing to these errors include lack of conceptual understanding, inaccuracy in reading the questions, forgetting integral formulas, and weak mastery of problem-solving steps. These findings are expected to contribute to improving the teaching methods of integral calculus in higher education, particularly in Mining Engineering programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdussamad, Zuchri. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Etika Jurnalisme Pada Koran Kuning : Sebuah Studi Mengenai Koran Lampu Hijau. Vol. 16, 2015.

Daswarman. “Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa PGSD Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Daswarman” 06, no. 02 (2022): 1335–1344.

Dewi, Heni Lilia; Amalia, Fatimah Zikra. “ANALISIS KESALAHAN MAHASISWA TADRIS MATEMATIKA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PERSAMAAN DIFERENSIAL BERDASARKAN KRITERIA WATSON” 4, no. 1 (2023): 57–76.

Dewi, Sutika. “Rumus Integral Tak Tentu Melalui Pola Integral” (2013): 49.

Ikhwan, Nur Fauziah. “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Menurut Watson Pada Materi Bentuk Aljabar Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Kelas Viii Smpn 40 Makassar Skripsi” (2023).

Mafruhah, Laely, and Arif Muchyidin. “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson.” Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 15, no. 1 (2020): 24–35.

Maulyda, Mohammad Archi. PARADIGMA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERBASIS NCTM, 2020.

Meika, Ika, Ratu Mauladaniyati, Asep Sujana, Nenden Suciyati Sartika, and Nais Pebriyani. “Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Integral.” AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika 12, no. 2 (2023): 2663.

Milles dan Huberman. Analisis Data Kualitatif. JAKARTA: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI -Press), 1992.

Nuranggraeni, Elva, Kiki Nia Sania Effendi, and Sutirna Sutirna Sutirna. “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau Dari Kesulitan Belajar Siswa.” JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika) 6, no. 2 (2020): 107–114.

Nurhidayah, Dina Fitri, and Rippi Maya. “Penggunaan Kriteria Watson Untuk Menganalisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Garis Dan Sudut.” Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif 4, no. 6 (2021): 1473–1480.

Putri, Sekartaji Machdalena Sari, and Rani Kurnia Putri. “Profil Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Teori Polya Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika Siswa.” Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 6, no. 2 (2022): 1776–1787.

Rachman, Ardi Fauzi; Saripuddin. “ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA KELAS XI PADA MATERI TRIGONOMETRI.” Sigma 5, no. 2 (2020): 37.

Radatz, Hendrik. “Students´Errors in the Mathematical Learning Process: A Survey*.” For the Learning of Mathematics 1, no. 1 (1980): 16–20.

Rahimah, Mila. “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Negeri.” Cybernetics: Journal Educational Research and Social Studies 4 (2023): 94–106.

Rusmana, Intdra Martha. “EFEKTIVITAS PENGGUNAAN PENDEKATAN SLIM-N-BIL TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA” 4, no. 3 (2014): 208–218.

Siswandi, Erlan. “Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Materi Persamaan Diferensial Berdasarkan Metode Newman Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika.” SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA 1, no. 1 (2021): 76–85.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.

Susilo, Bambang Eko, Mashuri, Endang Retno Winarti, and Edy Soedjoko. “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Kalkulus, Reduksi, Dan Strateginya Sebagai Upaya Konstruksi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Calon Guru.” Konservasi Pendidikan Jilid 2 (2022): 163–194. https://bookchapter.unnes.ac.id/index.php/kp/article/view/47.

Yuzianah, Dita, Prasetyo Budi Darmono, and Nila Kurniasih. “Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Teori Graf Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson.” Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE) 10, no. 1 (2024): 95–103.

Zulkardi, and Ratu Ilma Indra Putri. “Supporting Mathematics Teachers to Develop Jumping Task Using PISA Framework (JUMPISA).” Mathematics Education Journal 14, no. 2 (2020): 199–210.