Pengaruh Video Berbasis Anotasi Dalam Flipped Learning Terhadap Beban Kognitif dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v7i2.6189Keywords:
Flipped Learning, Annotated Videos, Cognitive Load, Learning Outcomes, Multimedia LearningAbstract
The flipped learning model places initial learning in the pre-class phase through video media; however, its effectiveness is highly dependent on the quality of the video design used because, in practice, students often struggle to understand the material and tend to forget information during in-class learning activities due to poorly managed cognitive load, particularly extraneous cognitive load arising from poorly structured presentations. This study aims to analyze differences in learning outcomes and cognitive load between conventional videos and annotation-based videos in flipped learning. The study employed a one-group repeated-measures posttest-only design, involving 30 eighth-grade students at a junior high school in Purwakarta. Cognitive load was measured using the Cognitive Load Questionnaire, which covers intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load, while learning outcomes were assessed through a final evaluation test. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The results showed that the use of annotated videos reduced intrinsic cognitive load from 3.17 to 1.60 and extraneous cognitive load from 3.16 to 1.49, while increasing germane cognitive load from 2.46 to 3.67. In addition, learning outcomes increased from an average of 66.00 to 92.33 with a significant difference (Z = -4.811) and an effect size of 0.88. These findings indicate that annotated videos can direct students’ attention to essential information, thereby reducing irrelevant cognitive load and enhancing meaningful cognitive processing, which makes learning more effective in a flipped learning environment.
Downloads
References
Afify, D. M. K. 2020. Effect of interactive video length within e-learning environments on cognitive load, cognitive achievement and retention of learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 73–75.
Beege, M., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. 2020. Correction to: The effect of signaling in dependence on the extraneous cognitive load in learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 1–24.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. 2023. Flip Your Classroom, Revised Edition: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. ASCD.
Bouten, A., Haerens, L., Van Doren, N., Compernolle, S., & De Cocker, K. 2021. An online video annotation tool for optimizing secondary teachers’ motivating style: Acceptability, usability, and feasibility. Teaching and Teacher Education.
Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. 2022. The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 285–303.
Chou, C. P., Chen, K. W., & Hung, C. J. 2021. A study on flipped learning concerning learning motivation and learning attitude in language learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–5.
Fan, E., Bower, M., & Siemon, J. 2024. Video tutorials in the traditional classroom: The effects on different types of cognitive load. Tech Know Learn, 29, 2017–2036.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. 2022. Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1–23.
Haerawan, H., Cale, W., & Barroso, U. (2024). The effectiveness of interactive videos in increasing student engagement in online learning. Journal of Computer Science Advancements, 2(5), 244–258.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang penilaian hasil belajar. Diakses pada 7 Maret 2026, dari https://peraturan.go.id/files/bn1507-2014.pdf
Joynt, C. 2024. Interactive videos: Its effect on cognitive load and students’ preferences across modes. International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 505–513.
Kalyuga, S., & Singh, A. M. 2021. Rethinking the expertise reversal effect in instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1–15.
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., & Rey, G. D. 2023. Development and validation of a theory-based questionnaire to measure different types of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 9.
Mayer, R. E. 2024. The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1–25.
Schrader, C., Kalyuga, S., & Plass, J. L. 2021. Motivation and Affect in Multimedia Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 121–131.
Sweller, J. 2011. Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76).
Tseng, S. S. 2021. The influence of teacher annotations on student learning engagement and video watching behaviors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1).
Von Wachter, J.-K., & Lewalter, D. 2023. Video annotation as a supporting tool for video-based learning in teacher training: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Higher Education, 12(2), 1.
Weinert, T., Benner, D., Dickhaut, E., Janson, A., Schöbel, S., & Leimeister, J. M. 2024. Engaging Students through Interactive Learning Videos in Higher Education: Developing a Creation Process and Design Patterns for Interactive Learning Videos. In Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Vol. 55).
Zhang, L., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. 2022. Managing cognitive load in multimedia learning: Recent advances. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1–28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indri Rahmawati Putri Widodo, Rizki Hikmawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









