Pelestarian Olahraga Tradisional melalui Teknologi Virtual Reality Implikasi terhadap Pendidikan Jasmani dan Industri Kreatif

Yolanda Yolanda; Ikhsan Ikhsan; Akbar Akbar

doi:10.55681/jiopj.v3i1.7336

Authors

Yolanda Yolanda Universitas Nahdatul Ulama Mataram
Ikhsan Ikhsan Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global
Akbar Akbar Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/jiopj.v3i1.7336

Keywords:

Virtual Reality, Olahraga Tradisional, Pendidikan Jasmani, Industri Kreatif, Mann-Whitney U, Simulasi Digital

Abstract

Olahraga tradisional menghadapi ancaman kepunahan akibat minimnya ruang bermain fisik dan pergeseran minat generasi muda menuju hiburan digital. Penelitian ini mengevaluasi efektivitas teknologi Virtual Reality (VR) sebagai medium pelestarian olahraga tradisional (seperti pencak silat, egrang, dan lompat batu) serta implikasinya terhadap kurikulum Pendidikan Jasmani dan lanskap Industri Kreatif. Menggunakan pendekatan simulasi komputasional Monte Carlo dengan menghasilkan 1.000 titik data virtual (N=1.000) pengguna, penelitian ini mengomparasi metode pembelajaran konvensional (video 2D dan demonstrasi fisik terbatas) dengan metode imersif VR (6 Degrees of Freedom). Variabel yang diukur mencakup Skor Retensi Spasial-Motorik kognitif, Tingkat Imersi (diadaptasi dari instrumen Igroup Presence Questionnaire/IPQ), dan Willingness to Pay (WTP) sebagai metrik kelayakan komersial dari sisi industri kreatif. Mengingat distribusi data tersimulasi bersifat asimetris, pengujian hipotesis komparatif dilakukan menggunakan statistik non-parametrik Mann-Whitney U Exact Test. Hasil komputasi menunjukkan bahwa integrasi VR meningkatkan retensi memori spasial-motorik secara signifikan sebesar 38,5% (skor 86.6 vs 62.5) dan mendongkrak skor imersi kognitif sebesar 95% dibandingkan metode konvensional (p < 0,001). Dari perspektif industri kreatif, purwarupa olahraga tradisional berbasis VR memicu lonjakan Willingness to Pay hingga 240% ($15.3 vs $4.5), mengindikasikan kelayakan komersial yang sangat tinggi. Kesimpulannya, teknologi VR tidak hanya bertindak sebagai arsip pelestarian budaya yang statis, melainkan medium interaktif yang mampu merevitalisasi pedagogi pendidikan jasmani sekaligus membuka ceruk monetisasi baru dalam industri game dan teknologi kreatif global.

References

Adisasmita, Yusuf. (1992). Olahraga Pilihan Atletik. Jakarta: Depdikbud Dikti Proyek Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Almeida, F., & Simoes, J. (2019). The role of serious games, gamification and Industry 4.0 tools in the Education 4.0 paradigm. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 120-136.

Bideau, B., Kulpa, R., Vignais, N., Brault, S., Multon, F., & Craig, C. (2010). Using Virtual Reality to Analyze Sports Performance. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 30(2), 14-21.

Buhalis, D., & Karatay, N. (2022). Mixed Reality (MR) for Generation Z in Cultural Heritage and Sports Tourism towards Web 3.0. Tourism Management Perspectives, 41, 100931.

Burhan Nurgiyantoro, dkk. (2004). Statistik Terapan. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Dwi Priyanto. (2011). Buku SPSS Analisis Statistika Data. Yogyakarta: Mediakom.

Düking, P., Holmberg, H. C., & Sperlich, B. (2018). The Potential Usefulness of Virtual Reality Systems for Athletes: A Short Review. Frontiers in Physiology, 9, 128.

Ginanjar Atmasubrata. (2012). Modul Pembelajaran Atletik Dasar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Howard, M. C. (2017). A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 317-327.

Hsu, W. C., Lin, H. C., & Chen, Y. C. (2021). Revitalizing Cultural Heritage through Virtual Reality: A Case Study of Traditional Martial Arts. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 48, 203-211.

Iqbal Hasan. (2002). Pokok-pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Kılıç, H. (2021). Preservice physical education teachers' perceptions of virtual reality technology. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(3), 1435-1442.

Lohse, K. R., et al. (2022). Wearable Technology and Data Analytics in Modern Sports: A Paradigm Shift in Athletic Training. Sports Medicine, 52(6), 1233-1245.

Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225-236.

Milanović, Z., Pantelić, S., Trajković, N., Sporiš, G., Kostić, R., & James, N. (2015). Broad-based Health Benefits of Traditional and Recreational Sports: A Systematic Review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(16), 1049-1055.

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill Education.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.

Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 266-281.

Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 74.

Suh, A., & Prophet, J. (2018). The State of Immersive Technology Research: A Literature Analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 77-90.

Suharsimi Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of learning and motivation, 55, 37-76.

Tassiopoulos, D., & Johnson, D. (2009). Social impacts of events. In Events management (pp. 52-70). Juta and Company Ltd.

Wang, D., & Xiang, Z. (2021). Agent-Based Modeling in Tourism Research: Analyzing the Digitalization of Traditional Attractions. Annals of Tourism Research, 89, 103233.