Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Materi Pecahan Siswa Sekolah Dasar Kelas V
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v7i4.6590Keywords:
Instrument Development, Sekolah Dasar, pemahaman konsep matematisAbstract
This study was motivated by the goal of developing a test instrument aligned with the indicators of fifth-grade elementary school students’ mathematical concept comprehension in the topic of fractions. The research was conducted using the Research and Development method, following the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) stages. The study was carried out at an elementary school in Karawang. The research subjects were 24 fifth-grade elementary school students selected through purposive sampling. The testing instrument was an essay test consisting of 16 questions containing several indicators of mathematical concept understanding, including: 1) Independently restating concepts; 2) Grouping objects based on specific characteristics; 3) Distinguishing examples and non-examples of a concept; 4) Presenting concepts in various forms of representation (tables, graphs, symbols, etc.); 5) Determining necessary and sufficient conditions that define a concept; 6) Applying mathematical procedures accurately; 7) Solving problems using appropriate concepts. The development of the instrument began with an expert judgment validation process, followed by empirical testing to determine the levels of validity, reliability, difficulty index, and discriminative power. The results show that 13 out of 16 items were deemed valid with an instrument reliability of 0.95, indicating a very high level of consistency. In addition, an evaluation of the item characteristics revealed that the difficulty level ranged from easy to moderate, with discriminative power ranging from good to very good. These findings indicate that the 13 items developed meet the quality standards for an assessment instrument suitable for measuring fifth-grade elementary school students’ understanding of mathematical concepts, particularly regarding fraction operations.
Downloads
References
Anggraini, D. F. K. (2022). Development of Mathematics Concept Understanding Assessment Instruments. DIKDAS MATAPPA, 5(4). DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v5i4.7210
Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria Instrumen dalam Suatu Penelitian. Jurnal Theorems (The Original Research of Mathematics), 2(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v2 i1.571.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Ariyanto. (2024). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Konstruk Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Operasi Hitung Bilangan Bulat Menggunakan CFA. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 748-762. https://doi.org/10.25157/aksioma.v13i1.748
Erlinawati, E., & Muslimah, M. (2021). Validitas Tes dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2). DOI: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.812
Fauzi, A. (2022). Mathematical Communication and Concept Understanding in Fractions. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(02). DOI: 10.22437/edumatica.v12i02.18902
Firmansyah, Gelar Dwirahayu, & Femmy Diwidian. (2025). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Berbasis Etnomatematika: Rail dan Retail. Lattice Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 5(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.15408/lattice.v5i1.90
Firmansyah, Gelar Dwirahayu, & Femmy Diwidian. (2025). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Berbasis Etnomatematika: Rail dan Retail. Lattice Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 5(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.15408/lattice.v5i1.90
Gronlund, N.E., Linn, R.L., & Miller, M.D. (2009). Measurement & evaluation in teaching. Tenth edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
Haryeni, H., & Yendra, R. (2021). Instrumen Valid untuk Pengukuran Kinerja Siswa dalam Matematika. Jurnal Kependidikan, 7(3). DOI: 10.33394/jk.v7i3.3982
Hidayah, N. (2023). Development of HOTS-based Assessment for Elementary Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 7(2). DOI: 10.23887/jisd.v7i2.56123
Kumalasari, S. E., & Rahayuningsih, S. (2025). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas V Materi Pecahan. SCIENCE: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 5(3), 1324-1331. https://doi.org/10.33333/science.v5i3.1324
Kusuma, J. (2021). Psychometric Properties of Essay Tests in Elementary Mathematics. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2). DOI: 10.17977/um031v6i2p145-155
Lestari, W. (2023). Evaluation of Student Misconceptions in Fractions Materials. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 6(1). DOI: 10.25273/jppm.v6i1.14201
Naf’an, E., & Handrianto, C. (2022). Application of the ADDIE Method in Educational Instruments Development. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika, 11(1). DOI: 10.30659/delta.v11i1.21405
Nana, S. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja
Nurhajati, A. R., dkk. (2024). Analysis of Concept Understanding Questions Using ANATES Version 4. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 7(4). DOI: 10.31004/jrpp.v7i4.32104
Nurrahmah, N., Syarifudin, S., & Taufikurrahman, T. (2025). Pemahaman Konsep Pecahan melalui Model KoNGSi di Sekolah Dasar: Perspektif Siswa dan Guru. DIKSI: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Sosial, 6(3), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.33333/diksi.v6i3.487
Putri, H. E., Nuraeni, F., Sabrina, H. A., & Suwangsih, E. (2024). Instrumen tes kemampuan berpikir logis matematis materi pecahan untuk sekolah dasar. Attadib: Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 118–134. https://www.jurnalfai-uikabogor.org/index.php/attadib
Rahayu, S. (2024). Valid and Reliable Essay Test Instruments for Mathematical Thinking. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1). DOI: 10.30659/delta.v13i1.35210
Ramadhan, F. (2024). Digital-Based Data Processing in Educational Research: Efficiency of ANATES. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 17(1). DOI: 10.31332/at.v17i1.7821
Saputra, M. A., dkk. (2025). Optimization of ADDIE Model in Developing Mathematics Learning Assessment. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1). DOI: 10.31004/inovasi.v9i1.12501
Sari, A. P. (2022). The Importance of Reliability in Educational Measurement Instruments. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1). DOI: 10.21831/pep.v26i1.45102
Setyosari, P. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan & pengembangan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia group.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
To, K. (1996). Mengenal Analisis Tes. Jurusan Psikologi Pendidikan dan Bimbingan FIP IKIP Bandung
Unaenah, E., & Sumantri, M. S. (2021). Analysis of Mathematical Concept Understanding in Fraction Materials. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2). DOI: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.812
Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tar biyah.v7i1.2100
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irfan Faozi, Hafiziani Eka Putri, Primanita Sholihah Rosmana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









