Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan E-Module IPA Problem-Based Learning Berorientasi Hots Bagi Siswa SMP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v7i3.6402Keywords:
E-Module, Problem-Based Learning, HOTS, Junior High SchoolAbstract
This study aims to analyze the needs for developing a Problem-Based Learning (PBL)-based science e-module oriented toward Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) to support critical thinking skills and self-regulated learning among junior high school students. A quantitative descriptive design was employed. Data were collected primarily through a validated student questionnaire (20 items, 4-point Likert scale) administered to 45 seventh-grade students at SMP Adzkia Islamic School Medan, supplemented by a semi-structured teacher interview as supporting data for contextual interpretation. The questionnaire demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.84). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and percentage). Results showed that science learning conditions were in the high category (M = 3.67; 91.8%), while students’ critical thinking skills (M = 2.85; 71.3%) and self-regulated learning (M = 2.72; 68.0%) were in the moderate category. Teacher interview data provided contextual support for these quantitative findings and confirmed the need for interactive, HOTS-oriented digital teaching materials. These findings empirically support the development of a PBL-HOTS-based e-module as a relevant solution to improve the quality of science learning at the junior high school level.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s educational objectives. Longman.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Kemendikbud. (2023). Laporan hasil Asesmen Nasional 2023. Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan, Kemendikbudristek.
Nurhayati, E., Sumarni, W., & Wardani, S. (2020). The effect of PBL model on critical thinking skills of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567, 022075.
Prastowo, A. (2014). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Diva Press.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.
Suarsana, I. M., & Mahayukti, G. A. (2013). Pengembangan e-modul berorientasi pemecahan masalah untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2), 264–275.
Wahyuni, S., Budiarso, A. S., & Prihatin, J. (2022). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan e-module IPA berbasis STEM untuk SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 45–53.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annisa Wildayani Sebayang, Susilowati, Asri Widowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
