Pengaruh Media Augmented Reality dan Power Point Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah di SMA Negeri 11 Kupang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v7i2.6225Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Power Point, learning outcomes, history education, media interaktifAbstract
Due to low learning outcomes (60% of students below the Minimum Competency (KKM) of 75) brought on by the predominance of traditional lecture methods, the purpose of this study is to compare the effects of PowerPoint and Augmented Reality (AR) on the history learning outcomes of eleventh-grade students at SMA Negeri 11 Kupang. By using a quantitative approach and a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test control group design, the population of 75 eleventh-grade students was divided into two groups, each consisting of 25 students, using cluster random sampling: experimental (AR) and control (PowerPoint). Examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, Levene's homogeneity test, independent t-test (SPSS), and N-Gain test. In terms of inter-group improvement, the experimental group showed better performance than the control group (pretest 60.4→posttest 83.6; gain 23.2; N-Gain 0.59, moderate), while the control group showed lower improvement (pretest 59.8 → posttest 74.2; gain 14.4; N-Gain 0.36, moderate). The independent t-test results showed a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.000 < 0.05). In conclusion, augmented reality is advised for secondary school since it is more successful than PowerPoint at enhancing comprehension, motivation, and participation in history learning.
Downloads
References
Arsyad, A. (2013). Media pembelajaran.
Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6
.4.355
Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2018.05.002
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational
Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6),
–1543.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2011). Instructional technology and media for learning (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson
Education.
Szabo, A., & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers & Education, 35(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-
(00)00030-0
Tufte, E. R. (2003). The cognitive style of PowerPoint. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y.,
& Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2012.10.024
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.20 16.11.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Samuel Hendriko Selan, Djakariah, Jefriano

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









