Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika Pada Materi Termodinamika Melalui Tes Diagnostik Four Tier Berbasis Web
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v7i2.6215Keywords:
Misconceptions, Thermodynamics, Four-Tier Diagnostic Test, Web-BasedAbstract
A deep understanding of physics concepts is essential for pre-service teachers, particularly in thermodynamics, which is inherently complex. This study aims to identify students’ misconceptions using a web-based four-tier diagnostic test. The research employed a quantitative approach with a descriptive exploratory method involving 15 students from the Physics Education Program at Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha who had completed the Thermodynamics course. The research instrument consisted of 15 items designed to classify students’ responses into three categories: conceptual understanding, lack of understanding, and misconceptions. The results indicate that misconceptions remain prevalent in several thermodynamics subtopics, particularly the ideal gas law, the First Law of Thermodynamics, thermodynamic processes, and entropy. Most misconceptions were accompanied by high levels of confidence. Additionally, some students provided factually correct answers but demonstrated incorrect conceptual reasoning. These findings suggest that the conceptual understanding of pre-service physics teachers is not yet fully developed and highlight the importance of using diagnostic tests as a basis for designing more effective thermodynamics instruction.
Downloads
References
Anggrayni, S., & Ermawati, F. U. (2019). The validity of Four-Tier’s misconception diagnostic test for Work and Energy concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012037
Brown, B., & Singh, C. (2021). Student understanding of the first law and second law of thermodynamics. European Journal of Physics, 42(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac18b4
Brundage, M. J., Meltzer, D. E., & Singh, C. (2024). Investigating introductory and advanced students’ difficulties with change in internal energy, work, and heat transfer using a validated instrument. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 10115. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010115
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010a). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010b). Do students know What they know and what they don’t know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4
Çelikkanlı, N. Ö., & Kızılcık, H. Ş. (2022). A Review of Studies About Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests in Physics Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1291–1311. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.175
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Hidayat, E. H., & Muslimin. (2022). Analysis of Understanding the Concept of Thermodynamics for Prospective Physics Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online, 10(1), 39–42.
Jamaluddin, A., Harjunowibowo, D., Akbar Rochim, M., Mahadmadi, F., Bulan Kakanita, H., & Laksono, P. W. (2015). Implementation of RFID on Computer Based Test (RF-CBT) system. Proceedings - Joint International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology and Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical and Chemical Engineering, ICEVT 2015 and IMECE 2015, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEVTIMECE.2015.7496645
Maulida, F., Alatas, F., & Solehat, D. (2024). Studi Literatur Miskonsepsi Pembelajaran Hukum I Termodinamika: Identifikasi Dan Solusi. Seminar Nasioanl FITK UIN Jakarta, 1(1), 170–180.
Mulop, N., Yusof, K. M., & Tasir, Z. (2012). A Review on Enhancing the Teaching and Learning of Thermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.706
Öz, H., & Özturan, T. (2018). Computer-based and paper-based testing: Does the test administration mode influence the reliability and validity of achievement tests? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 67–85. www.jlls.org
Pujayanto, P., Budiharti, R., Adhitama, E., Nuraini, N. R. A., & Putri, H. V. (2018). The development of a web-based assessment system to identify students’ misconception automatically on linear kinematics with a four-tier instrument test. Physics Education, 53(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aac695
Sutarja, M. C., & Wulandari, A. Y. R. (2021). Identifying students’ difficulty in the basic of thermodynamics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2126(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2126/1/012010
Yuliana, I. (2023). Kajian Literatur: Miskonsepsi dan Metode Identifikasinya. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 13(1), 267–275.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ina Yuliana, Putu Widiarini, A.A Istri Agung Rai Sudiatmika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









