ANALISIS POTENSI SEKTOR PERTANIAN, KEHUTANAN DAN PERIKANAN DI DAERAH KABUPATEN/KOTA KEPULAUAN DI BAGIAN BARAT SUMATERA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v4i2.877Keywords:
The potential of the agricultural, forest sectors, fisheries sectorsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the potential of the agricultural, forestry and fisheries sectors in six regencies and one city in the western part of Sumatra, namely; Simeulue District, Aceh Province, Nias, South Nias, North Nias, West Nias and Gunungsitoli City in North Sumatra Province and Mentawai Islands District in West Sumatra Province. The analytical method used is through Location Quotient (LQ) Analysis, Dynamic Location Quotient (DLQ) and Kalssen Typology Analysis during the 2008-2022 period. The results of the LQ calculation show that the agriculture, forestry and fisheries sectors are the basic or leading sectors in Simeulue, Nias, South Nias, North Nias, West Nias and Mentawai Islands, while this sector in Gunungsitoli City is a non-base sector. Based on the results of the DLQ analysis, although this sector is the base sector in Nias, North Nias, West Nias and the Mentawai Islands, in the long term/time period 2008-2022 the growth rate of this sector tends to slow down markedly by a DLQ value < 1. In Nias Regency, even during a period of 15 years, only once in 2013 did it show a DLQ value > 1 or a fast growth rate, besides that it experienced a slow rate. In contrast to the results of the analysis in Simeulue and South Nias Regencies, where during the period 2008-2022 this base sector was consistent with growth rates that tended to be fast. While the results of the Klassen Typology analysis show that the agricultural, forestry and fisheries sectors in South Nias and Mentawai Islands are developed sectors, in Simeulue, Nias, North Nias and West Nias Regencies are developing sectors, namely the advanced but depressed sector, while in Gunungsitoli City it is sectors that have the potential to be developed into advanced sectors.
Downloads
References
Adi, L., Suprijati, J., Rosidah, R., & Cahya, V. (2020). Analisis Sektor Basis dan Shift-Share Pekerja Menurut Lapangan Usaha PDRB Propinsi Jawa Timur. Jae (Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomi), 5(1), 10–18.
Aisyah, I., Juarini, J., & Puspitaningrum, D. A. (2020). Analisis Potensi Sektor Pertanian, Kehutanan, dan Perikanan sebagai Dasar Perencanaan Pembangunan Ekonomi Kabupaten Pacitan. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Ekonomi, 21(1), 79–91.
Arsyad, L. (2010). Ekonomi Pembangunan, edisi kelima. Yogyakarta: Upp Stim Ykpn.
Jafar, R., & Meilvidiri, W. (2021). Analisa Location Quotient (LQ), Dynamic Location Quotient (DLQ), dan Klasifikasi Carvalho dalam Menentukan Potensi Ekonomi Kabupaten Takalar. ICOR: Journal of Regional Economics, 2(03), 29–39.
Klassen, L. H. (1965). Area Economic and Social Redevelopment. Paris: OECD.
Kremen, C., Iles, A., & Bacon, C. (2012). Diversified farming systems: an agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society, 17(4).
Lee, Y., & Gordon, R. H. (2005). Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 1027–1043.
Munandar, T., & Wardoyo, R. (2016). Fuzzy-Klassen model for development disparities analysis based on gross regional domestic product sector of a region. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1606.03191.
Nazipawati, N. (2007). Aplikasi Model Static dan Dynamic Location Quotients dan Shift-Share dalam Perencanaan Ekonomi Regional, Studi Kasus Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ulu Propinsi Sumatera Selatan. Eko-Regional: Jurnal Pembangunan Ekonomi Wilayah, 2(2).
Oktavia, Z., Darwanto, D. H., & Hartono, S. (2015). Sektor Pertanian Unggulan di Sumatera Selatan. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 1(2), 61–69.
Puspitawati, L. T. (2013). Analisis perbandingan faktor-faktor penyebab ketimpangan pembangunan antar kabupaten/kota di kawasan kedungsapur. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 2(2).
Ragiliawan, Z., Saputri, O. D., & Nuraeni, Y. (2018). Aplikasi location quotient dan tipologi klassen untuk menghitung produktivitas, laju produktivitas dan elastisitas tenaga kerja pada sektor basis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan, Hlm, 387–398.
Sari, F. W. A. W., & Bangun, R. H. B. (2019). Analisis Peranan Sektor Pertanian, Kehutanan dan Perikanan pada Perekonomian Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Agroland: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 26(3), 198–211.
Sjafrizal. (2014). Perencanaan pembangunan daerah dalam era otonomi. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Syukur, R., Patiung, M., & Hermawati, D. T. (2021). Analisis Sektor Pertanian, Kehutanan Dan Perikanan Sebagai Sektor Potensial Yang Berkelanjutan Di Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Jurnal Ilmiah Sosio Agribis, 21(1).
Van Leeuwen, B., & Földvári, P. (2016). The development of inequality and poverty in Indonesia, 1932–2008. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(3), 379–402.
Wati, R. M., & Arifin, A. (2019). Analisis location quotient dan shift-share sub sektor pertanian di Kabupaten Pekalongan Tahun 2013-2017. Jurnal Ekonomi-QU, 9(2).
Widodo, T. (2006). Perencanaan pembangunan: aplikasi komputer (era otonomi daerah). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN, 48.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
