Strategi Penguatan Komitmen Organisasional Guru dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Program Guru Penggerak di Lingkungan SMA/K Kabupaten Bandung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i2.5937Keywords:
Teacher Organizational Commitment, Effectiveness of the Leading Teacher Program, Strengthening Strategy, Educational ManagementAbstract
The Guru Penggerak Program (PGP) is a strategic initiative designed to strengthen teachers’ instructional leadership and improve educational quality in Indonesia. However, its implementation in senior high schools (SMA/SMK) in Kabupaten Bandung faces challenges, including inconsistent post-training mentoring and uneven impact dissemination. This qualitative descriptive-analytical study examines the program’s effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and strategies to enhance sustainable impact. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with Guru Penggerak teachers, principals, and supervisors, supported by participant observation and questionnaires from 34 teachers. Findings show that PGP is generally effective, fostering student-centered practices and increased teacher initiative, though its success depends on principal support. Teachers demonstrate strong affective commitment, moderate continuance commitment, and weaker normative commitment. Using the SOAR framework and 5-I stages, strategies are proposed across short-, medium-, and long-term phases to strengthen networks and integrate PGP values into school culture.
Downloads
References
Isnani, N., & Hadiansyah, H. (2025). Analisis implementasi program Merdeka Belajar di Kabupaten Bandung. Laporan Analisis Dashboard Rapor Pendidikan Kabupaten Bandung.
Kamdi, W. (2014). Beban kerja guru dan implikasinya terhadap kinerja profesional. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 21(2), 145–156.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2024). Data Guru Penggerak Provinsi Jawa Barat dan Kabupaten Bandung. BBGP Jawa Barat.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurhasanah, S., Sukmawati, R., & Sukri, M. (2022). Partisipasi guru SMA/SMK dalam Program Guru Penggerak dan faktor penghambatnya. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 29(1), 55–68.
Pratiwy, D., & Hadiyanti, R. (2025). Tantangan implementasi Program Guru Penggerak dalam konteks perubahan organisasi sekolah. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 33–47.
Republik Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
Republik Indonesia. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru.
Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2008 tentang Guru.
Republik Indonesia. (2021a). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 19 Tahun 2021 tentang Program Guru Penggerak.
Republik Indonesia. (2021b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 40 Tahun 2021 tentang Penugasan Guru sebagai Kepala Sekolah.
Sijabat, R., Simanjuntak, T., & Hutabarat, L. (2022). Beban kerja dan kesiapan guru dalam mengikuti program pengembangan profesional berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(3), 201–214.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erif Deyussaswati, Nita Nurliawati, Teni Listiani, Edah Jubaedah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








