Melampaui Positivisme: Krisis Relevansi Epistemologis Penelitian Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi dan Transformasi Universitas Berbasis Inovasi Sumber Daya Alam Lokal Untuk Pembangunan Sdm Unggul Indonesia 2045

Authors

  • Dany Rakca Pasca Sarjana Doktoral, Universitas Pakuan, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i2.5889

Keywords:

Research Epistemology, Relevance Crisis, Higher Education Management, Local-Based Innovation, Human Capital, Indonesia Emas 2045

Abstract

Research on higher education management in Indonesia has largely been built upon a positivist paradigm that emphasizes measurability, generalization, and methodological rigor. While this approach has contributed to strengthening academic governance, its relevance is increasingly questioned as universities are expected to play a more active role in socio-economic transformation and the development of high-quality human resources. This article examines the epistemological relevance crisis of the positivist paradigm and proposes a reorientation of higher education management research toward more contextual and transformative approaches. Using a conceptual-critical perspective, the article demonstrates that the dominance of positivism tends to confine the role of universities to that of graduate producers, thereby neglecting their strategic capacity as centers of innovation and creators of economic value based on local natural resource potential. The conceptual findings of this article underscore that the adoption of post-positivist and transformative research paradigms is a prerequisite for strengthening university contributions to the agenda of independent natural resource governance, as articulated in the 2024–2029 Asta Cita Government Program. Consequently, reorienting the research paradigm of higher education management constitutes a crucial foundation for human capital development and the strengthening of nation-building efforts toward Indonesia Emas 2045.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aliyu, M. S., Zubairu, U. B., & Bakar, A. R. A. (2022). Conceptual paper: Its role, structure, and development. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(5), 1229–1242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2021-0273

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208100301

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London: Heinemann.

Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fattah, N. (2019). Manajemen pendidikan berbasis kinerja. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Farquharson, L., Thornton, S., & Yu, S. (2020). Supporting methodological quality in conceptual qualitative research: A social science perspective. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(8), 1016–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419833370

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2021). A bibliometric review of research on educational leadership and management in education journals, 2000–2020. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220972220

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Laporan kondisi ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan RI.

Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Outlook ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan RI.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Laporan kinerja riset dan inovasi nasional. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022). Evaluasi implementasi kebijakan Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 47(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704700102

Prasojo, L. D. (2018). Manajemen pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Pratt, M. G. (2020). The problem of meaning in management research: Lessons from a long and frustrated search. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0192

Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.

Schwandt, T. A. (2019). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2019). Pendidikan, kebudayaan, dan masyarakat madani Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Yamin, M. (2021). Paradigma baru pembangunan sumber daya manusia Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

How to Cite

Rakca, D. (2026). Melampaui Positivisme: Krisis Relevansi Epistemologis Penelitian Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi dan Transformasi Universitas Berbasis Inovasi Sumber Daya Alam Lokal Untuk Pembangunan Sdm Unggul Indonesia 2045. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 7(2), 1554–1566. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i2.5889