Reformulation of National Defense Policy Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology for Decision-Making

Authors

  • Ghazalie Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Yusuf Ali Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Aris Sarjito Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Bambang Kustiawan Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Asep Adang Supriyadi Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Ceppi Hilmansyah Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Wisnu Saputro Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Katherine Erika Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i2.5764

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, National Defense Policy, Strategic Decision-Making, Responsible AI, Defense Governance

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into national defense strategy has emerged as a pivotal necessity amid increasing geopolitical tensions, cyber threats, and the evolution of modern warfare. This essay explores the reformulation of national defense policy in Indonesia by leveraging AI technologies to enhance strategic decision-making, operational effectiveness, and national security resilience. Through a qualitative-descriptive approach, the study highlights how AI contributes to intelligence analysis, military simulation, autonomous weapons systems, and cyber defense infrastructure. However, the integration of AI also presents complex challenges, including cybersecurity vulnerabilities, ethical dilemmas related to autonomous decision-making in combat, and the lack of standardized international regulations. The study underscores the need for comprehensive policy reform that balances technological innovation with adherence to humanitarian and international law. Drawing upon global case studies—from the European Union’s strategic autonomy initiatives to Nordic operational cooperation and post-Brexit UK-EU security dynamics—the paper identifies best practices and policy gaps. Key recommendations include strengthening cyber defense systems, developing ethical oversight mechanisms, improving regulatory clarity, and fostering international cooperation on AI governance in defense. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the importance of human-centered AI deployment and the development of skilled military personnel capable of managing AI-based systems. The findings support the necessity for Indonesia to adopt an adaptive, ethical, and collaborative AI defense policy that aligns with global norms while preserving national sovereignty and security. This reformulation ensures that AI becomes not just a tool of modernization, but a strategic asset that enhances both the deterrent and responsive capacities of the state in an increasingly uncertain global security environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., & Farahnak, L. R. (2014). The implementation leadership scale (ILS): Development of a brief measure of unit-level implementation leadership. Implementation Science, 9(45), 1-10.

Balancing Expectations: Navigating Medically Necessary Torso Procedures with Cosmetic Components in the Military Healthcare System (2024). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Bergmann, J., & Müller, P. (2021). Failing forward in the EU’s common security and defense policy: The integration of EU crisis management. Routledge.

Boșilcă, R.-L., Stenberg, M., & Riddervold, M. (2021). Copying in EU security and defence policies: The case of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia. Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Candel, J. J. L. (2020). What’s on the menu? A global assessment of MUFPP signatory cities’ food strategies. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 44(7), 919–946.

Copying-in-EU-security-and-defence-policies. (2021). Copying in EU security and defence policies: The case of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia. Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Cyber-security-defence-policies. (2020). Cyber Security Defence Policies: A Proposed Guidelines for Organisations Cyber Security Practices. Science and Information Organization.

Darwish, T.K., et al. (2020). Absorptive capacity and innovation: The role of transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 118, 317-329.

Delgado Morán, J., Jiménez Reina, J., & Jiménez Reina, R. (2020). Cooperative security as a European Union prevention and response measure. Revista Científica General José María Córdova.

Delgado Morán, M. et al. (2020). Cooperative security as a European Union prevention and response measure. Escuela Militar de Cadetes.

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2018). Towards Secure Convergence of Cloud and IoT.

European Commission. (2021). Strategic autonomy and digital sovereignty in the EU. Brussels: European Commission.

Ewers-Peters, N. M. (2021). Brexit’s implications for EU-NATO cooperation: Transatlantic bridge no more? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.

Fortier, J., & Massie, J. (2023). Strategic hedgers: Australia and Canada’s defence adaptation to the global power transition. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Ge, J., Wang, H., & Zhang, L. (2022). Study on space diversity and influencing factors of Tunpu settlement in central Guizhou Province of China. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH.

Knutsen, B. (2022). A Weakening Transatlantic Relationship: Redefining the EU–US Security and Defence Cooperation. Cogitatio Press.

Krupskyi, O.P., & Kuzmytska, Y. (2020). Organizational Culture and Business Strategy: Connection and Role for A Company Survival. Central European Business Review, 9(4), 1-24.

Mader, M., & Schoen, H. (2023). No Zeitenwende (yet): Early Assessment of German Public Opinion Toward Foreign and Defense Policy After Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Springer VS.

Majchrzak, D., Michalski, K., & Reginia-Zacharski, J. (2021). Readiness of the Polish Crisis Management System to Respond to Long-Term, Large-Scale Power Shortages and Failures (Blackouts). MDPI.

Massie, J. (2023). Strategic hedgers: Australia and Canada’s defence adaptation to the global power transition. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Miró, J. (2023). Responding to the global disorder: The EU’s quest for open strategic autonomy. Routledge.

Nasser, H. I., & Hussain, M. A. (2022). Provably curb man-in-the-middle attack-based ARP spoofing in a local network. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science.

oșilcă, R.-L., Stenberg, M., & Riddervold, M. (2021). Copying in EU security and defence policies: The case of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia. Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Oyelami, J., & Kassim, A. M. (2020). Cyber Security Defence Policies: A Proposed Guidelines for Organisations Cyber Security Practices. Science and Information Organization.

Poppensieker, T., & Riemenschnitter, R. (2019). A New Posture for Cybersecurity in a Networked World. Digital McKinsey and Global Risk Practice.

Qari, S., Börger, T., Lohse, T., & Meyerhoff, J. (2024). The value of national defense: Assessing public preferences for defense policy options. European Journal of Political Economy, 85.

Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional (2024). The Defense-Development Nexus: Brazilian Nuclear Policy Under the Workers’ Party Administrations.

Rosa, P. et al. (2020). Neoclassical Realism and Italy’s Military Behaviour 1946-2010: A Combined Dyad-Nation Analysis. UBM Exhibition Singapore PTE LTD.

Rosa, P., Benati, S., Foradori, P., & Longoni, G. M. (2020). Neoclassical realism and Italy’s military behaviour, 1946–2010: A combined dyad/nation analysis. UBM Exhibition Singapore PTE LTD.

Saxi, H. L. (2022). Alignment but not Alliance: Nordic Operational Military Cooperation. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 13, 53–71.

Science and Information Organization. (2020). Cyber-security defence policies: A proposed guideline for organizations cyber security practices. Science and Information Organization.

Strand, L. (2024). The Reactivation and Reimagination of Military Conscription in Sweden. SAGE Publications Inc.

Sun, F., & Carson, R. T. (2020). Coastal wetlands reduce property damage during tropical cyclones. National Academy of Sciences.

Sweeney, C., & Winn, N. (2022). Do or die: The UK, the EU, and internal/external security cooperation after Brexit. Palgrave Macmillan.

The-Reactivation-and-Reimagination-of-Military-Conscription-in-Sweden. (2024). The Reactivation and Reimagination of Military Conscription in Sweden. SAGE Publications Inc. TQ1 Defense-Development Nexus (2024).

von der Leyen, U. (2019). Political Guidelines for the 2019–2024 Mandate. European Commission.

Wieslander, A. (2022). The Hultqvist Doctrine: Swedish Security and Defence Policy after the Russian Annexation of Crimea. Routledge.

Zhao, M., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). The In-Situ Spatial-Temporal Evolution of the Settlement Space along the Grand Canal, Tianjin Section: From the Perspective of Cultural Heritage. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI).

Zheng, Q., Li, J., & Duan, X. (2023). The impact of environmental tax and R&D tax incentives on green innovation. Sustainability, 15, 7303.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Ghazalie, G., Ali, Y., Sarjito, A., Kustiawan, B., Supriyadi, A. A., Hilmansyah, C., Saputro, W., & Erika, K. (2026). Reformulation of National Defense Policy Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology for Decision-Making . Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 7(2), 1821–1835. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i2.5764