Criminal Liabialty Based On the Child Nutrition of Vicarious Liabialty for Poisoning Cases in the Child Nutrition Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i2.5554Keywords:
criminal liabialty, vicarious liabialty, food poisoning, and the child nutrition programAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze criminal liability based on vicarious liability in a mass poisoning case that occurred during a nutritious food program for children, a government policy aimed at improving the nutritional quality of students. The problem arose when the food provided by the organizer did not meet food safety standards, resulting in harm to children as consumers who are legally entitled to safety and security as stipulated in the Consumer Protection Law. The approach used in this study is a normative legal method, analyzing legislation, legal doctrine, and the concept of criminal liability within the framework of employment relationships. The results of this study indicate that the program involved many parties, including local governments, catering providers, schools, and third parties involved in distribution. Therefore, the principle of vicarious liability is relevant for assessing the criminal liability of those who benefited, had authority, and were negligent in supervising the program. In conclusion, the application of the principle of vicarious liability can provide clarity regarding the primary responsibility in cases of negligence that lead to poisoning. It also serves as a basis for strengthening oversight mechanisms to ensure that the public program's goal of fulfilling children's rights does not become a potential loss to the community.
Downloads
References
Akbar, M., & Rosando, A. F. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Koki terhadap Konsumen yang Mengalami Keracunan Makanan (Studi Kasus: Kasus Keracunan Makanan di Restoran Cepat Saji X Tahun 2021). Journal Evidence Of Law, 4(1), 1-10.
Arisanti, R. R., Indriani, C., & Wilopo, S. A. (2018). Contribution of agents and causative factors to extraordinary events of food poisoning in Indonesia: a systematic study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 34(3), 99-106.
Bafadhal, F., Alissa, E., & Idris, I. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Atas Keamanan Pangan Oleh Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 5(1), 133-151.
Cahyani, M., Sardjono, A., Rokan, M. K., & Tobing, D. (2022). Strengthening the Rights of Children as End Consumers in the Mandatory Implementation of Indonesian National Standard (Sni) of Toys (Protection of Children as Vulnerable Consumers in Indonesia). Issue 6 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 5, 1166.
Emmanulle, K. F. V., Saputra, R. A., Wicaksono, A. S. P. Y., Wicaksana, D. P., & Kamal, U. (2025). The Poisoning of Free Nutritious Lunch Programs in a Review of Social Law and Aspects of Developing Countries. Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 1(04), 1329-1342.
Handaru, D. N. H. (2021). Hukum dan konsumen anak: Studi tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap cerita anak (Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Reposit
Indraswati, D. (2023). Penyakit Berbasis Lingkungan Bersumber Dari Makanan Dan Minuman (Diare, Cacingan Dan Keracunan): Diktat Kuliah Pengembangan Bahan Pengajaran Mata Kuliah Penyakit Berbasis Lingkungan.
Kurniawan, K. D., & Hapsari, D. R. I. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi menurut vicarious liability theory. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(2), 324-346.
Kurniawan, R. (2015). Tanggung Jawab Pidana Pelaku Usaha Akibat Keracunan Makanan. Lex Crimen, 4(8).
Maesaroh, M., Widowati, S., & Fanani, M. Z. (2025). An extraordinary case of poisoning of ready-to-eat processed foods. Karimah Tauhid, 4(1), 573-587.
Maulana, I., & Agusta, M. (2021). Konsep Dan Implementasi Restorative Justice Di Indonesia. Datin law jurnal, 2(11), 46-70.
Mihardja, A., Kurniawan, C., & Anthony, K. (2020). Vicarious Liability: A Present Perspective. Journal of Education and Development, 8(1), 561570.
Pattiwael, S. A., Nawi, S., & Sahban, S. (2022). Legal Protection for Wives Who Apply for Marriage Annulment Based on the Compilation of Islamic Law. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 3(2), 107-120.
Qomarrullah, R., Suratni, S., Wulandari, L., & Sawir, M. (2025). Dampak Jangka Panjang Program Makan Bergizi Gratis terhadap Kesehatan dan Keberlanjutan Pendidikan. Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication, 5(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v5i2.660
Rahayu, H. S., & Lukitasari, D. (2021). The Concept of Corporate Liability in the Law Information and Electronic Transactions. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 6(1), 83-92.
Riyanto, O. S., & Sinaga, M. R. E. (2025). Enforcement of children's right to safe and healthy food: A case study of poisoning in free nutritious feeding programs reviewed from the perspective of state responsibility. Juris Humanity: Journal of Human Rights Law Research and Studies, 4(1), 1-10.
Rokilah, R. (2020). Dinamika Negara Hukum Indonesia: Antara Rechtsstaat dan Rule of Law. Nurani Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v2i1.8167
Rokilah, R. (2020). The Dynamics of the Indonesian Legal State: Between Rechtsstaat and the Rule Of Law. Legal Conscience, 2(1), 12-22.
Silaswaty, N. D. F. (2018). Protection of School Children as Snack Consumers in the Perspective of Consumer Protection. PROCEEDINGS, 1(01).
Wahyu Simon Tampubolon, “Peranan Dan Tanggung Jawab Badan Pengawas Obat Dan Makanan (Bpom) Terkait Kasus Albothyl Menurut Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen,” Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 6, no. 1 (2018): 69–78, https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v6i1.266.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Silvia Aprilia, Yogi Prasetyo, Ferry Irawan Febriansyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








