Perbandingan Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa di Lingkungan MAN 2 Kota Padang dan MAN 2 Kabupaten Solok Selatan

Authors

  • Alfian Falaakh Universitas Andalas, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, 25175, Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
  • Aslinda Universitas Andalas, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, 25175, Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
  • Ike Revita Universitas Andalas, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, 25175, Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v5i1.2164

Keywords:

Politeness, Politeness Principles, Politeness Strategies, Students

Abstract

This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Data collection was carried out using the simak method with the technique of simak libat cakap. The data in this study were obtained from the observation process, notes, and recordings. In analyzing the data, the author classifies the data that has been obtained into politeness strategies and principles. The author also uses translational and pragmatic methods. The translational method is used to translate the Minang-language data into Indonesian. The data is presented using informal method in the form of described speech and dialog. The results of the analysis show that 1) students in MAN 2 of Padang City tend to use positive politeness strategies with 64.77% and so do in MAN 2 of South Solok Regency with 56.84%. This is because students at MAN 2 of Padang City and MAN 2 of South Solok Regency both try to be close to their speech partners by using speech that contains positive politeness. 2) the principle of politeness that tends to be used by students in MAN 2 Padang City is the maxim of generosity and acceptance with 37.50% while in MAN 2 South Solok Regency tends to use the principle of politeness with the maxim of aggreement 58.33%. Based on these results, students at MAN 2 of Padang City tend to praise their speech partners and give burden to themselves in speaking, while at MAN 2 of South Solok Regency are more likely to maximize compatibility with their speech partners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anugrah, M., S. (2021). Kesantunan Berbahasa Pembeli di Pasar Raya Solok. Tesis. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya. Universitas Andalas: Padang.

Anugrah, M., S., Revita, I., dan Marnita, R. (2020). Kesantunan Linguistik dalam Interaksi Jual Beli di Pasar Raya Solok. Lingua, Vol. 17, No. 2, September 2020 p-ISSN: 1979-9411; e-ISSN: 2442-238X.

Aslinda. (2016). Sapaan dalam Bahasa Minangkabau: Suatu Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Disertasi. Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Bangi.

Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts.

Cambridge, USA and London, UK: MIT Press.

Brown, P, & Levinson, S C. (1987). Politeness. Some Universal in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth Edi). SAGE Publication Inc.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women Men and Politeness. London: Longman.

Holmes, J. (2001). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics 2nd edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Lakoff, R. (1973). The Logic of Politeness: Or, Minding Your p’s and q’s. Chicago Linguistic Society

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.

Mantra, I., B., N., dkk. (2022). Language Politeness Strategies Employed by Lecturers and Students in Online Learning. Indonesian Journal of English Education.

Maulidya, R. A., dkk. (2022). Politeness Use in The Online English Learning Community and Its Pedagogical Implication. Indonesian Journal of English Education.

Mayasari, Lubis, I. S., dan Pujiono, M. (2021). The Politeness Concept of the Language Spoken by Women in Javanese Culture. Technium: Social Sciences Journal.

Muldagaliyeva, A. A., dkk. (2022). A Socio-Cultural Study of Face and Politeness Conceptions in the Kazakh Context. PERTANIKA Journals, Social Sciences and Humanities.

Nida, E. A., & Wonderly, W. L. (1971). Communication Roles of Languages in Multilingual Societies. The Bible Translator, 22(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/000608447102200103

Normalita, A. (2021). Strategi Kesantunan Positif dan Negatif dalam Tindak Tutur Direktif di Lingkungan Keluarga. Jalabahasa Vol.17 No.2 November 2021 hlm.134-147.

Oktavianus dan Revita. (2013). Kesantunan dalam Bahasa Minangkabau. Padang: Universitas Andalas.

Rasyid, R. (2018). Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa Berbasis Gender dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sma Negeri 6 Sidenreng Rappang. Fakultas Bahasa dan Sastra Universitas Negeri Makassar: Makassar.

Revita, I., Triclarise, R., Anggraini, N., & Gunawan, F. (2020). Politeness in Domestic Verbal Violence Against Women in Indonesia. Aksara, 32(1), 109--118. https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v32i1.530.109-118).

Revita, I., Marwati, S., Mardiah, A., Ayumi. (2020). Maxims of Politeness Performed by Female Sellers at Traditional Market in Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Arbitrer Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020).

Salman, H. T dan Zailin Shah Binti Yusoff. (2021). Realization of Positive and Negative Politeness as maneuvering strategies in Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Technium: Social Sciences Journal Vol 21 820-825.

Searle, J.R., and Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1969). An Essay in the Philosophy of Language: Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J.R. (1971). The Philosophy of Language. London: Oxford University Press.

Searle, J.R. (1979). Speech Act and Recent Linguistics: Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.

Syarifuddin, N. (2022). Perbandingan Strategi Kesantunan dalam Bahasa Inggris dan Bahasa Makassar. Tesis. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya. Universitas Hasanuddin: Makassar.

Wardhaugh, R. (1988). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Wijana, I. Dewa Putu. (1996). Dasar-dasar pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-19

How to Cite

Falaakh, A., Aslinda, A., & Revita, I. (2024). Perbandingan Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa di Lingkungan MAN 2 Kota Padang dan MAN 2 Kabupaten Solok Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 5(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v5i1.2164