Peran Tawakkal dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Psikologis Mahasiswi Ibu Rumah Tangga yang Mengalami Kecemasan: Perspektif Psikologi Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i2.5780Keywords:
Tawakkal, Psychological Well-Being, Married Female Students, Housewives, Online Learning, Islamic PsychologyAbstract
This study examines the relationship between tawakkal (trustful reliance upon Allah) and psychological well-being among married female students who also perform the role of housewives while pursuing online learning. The transition to online education has intensified multiple role demands, which may contribute to anxiety, fatigue, and diminished well-being. Within Islamic psychology, tawakkal is viewed as a religious coping orientation that may support emotional regulation, meaning-making, and resilience in stressful circumstances. Therefore, this research aimed (1) to describe levels of tawakkal and psychological well-being and (2) to test whether tawakkal is significantly associated with psychological well-being in this population. A quantitative correlational, cross-sectional design was employed. A total of 102 respondents were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected online between 25 November and 2 December 2025 using Likert-type questionnaires measuring tawakkal (14 items; Cronbach’s α = .646) and psychological well-being (12 items; α = .459). Descriptive results indicated moderate-to-high mean scores for tawakkal (M = 3.511, SD = 0.456) and psychological well-being (M = 3.587, SD = 0.378). Shapiro–Wilk testing showed that tawakkal scores were not normally distributed (p = .003); therefore, Spearman’s rank correlation was applied. The findings revealed a positive, statistically significant association between tawakkal and psychological well-being (ρ = .350, p < .001). These results suggest that higher tawakkal is related to higher psychological well-being among married female online learners. Practical implications include integrating tawakkal-based strengthening strategies into counseling and psycho-spiritual support services, while further research is recommended to employ instruments with stronger reliability and to include anxiety-related measures for deeper explanation.
Downloads
References
Abu-Raiya, H., Pargament, K. I., Krause, N., & Ironson, G. (2019). Religion as problem, religion as solution: Religious buffers of psychological distress. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000203
Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01167
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Durak, M., Şenol-Durak, E., & Karaköse, S. (2023). Psychological distress and anxiety among housewives. Current Psychology, 42, 14517–14528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02636-0
Folkman, S. (2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 21(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701740457
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 278730. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032
Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. Guilford Press.
Pargament, K. I., Feuille, M., & Burdzy, D. (2011). The Brief RCOPE. Religions, 2(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel2010051
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
Setiawan, R., & Suryani, E. (2019). Desain penelitian cross sectional. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan, 8(2), 85–90.
Sieber, S. D. (1974). Role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094422
Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rina Melati, Ummu Khuzaimah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





