Status Hukum Tanah Bekas Hak Guna Bangunan yang Tidak Diperpanjang dalam Perspektif Pemanfaatan Aset Negara (Studi Kasus Lahan Pelabuhan Sofifi)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i2.5729Keywords:
Building Use Right, State Land, State Assets, Legal Certainty, Sofifi PortAbstract
This research aims to analyze the control of former Building Use Right (Hak Guna Bangunan/HGB) land owned by PT. Darko Modul & Timber whose term has expired and was not extended according to the Indonesian land law framework, as well as to examine the legal construction required to provide legal certainty over the status of such land so that it may be utilized as a State Asset (State-Owned Property), with a case study of the Sofifi Port land. This research employs an empirical legal research method with a qualitative approach. Empirical legal research is conducted to examine the implementation of law in practice (law in action) by analyzing how land law regulations and state asset management norms are applied in reality. The data used in this research consist of primary data obtained through interviews with relevant stakeholders and secondary data derived from laws and regulations, court decisions, legal doctrines, and related legal literature. The results of this research indicate that the expiration of the Building Use Right without extension results in the termination of the right by operation of law, and consequently, the land reverts to land directly controlled by the state. This legal consequence is further affirmed by the Decision of the Soasio District Court Number 16/Pdt.G/2025/PN Sos, which declares that the rights of PT. Darko Modul & Timber over the disputed land have been extinguished and that the former Building Use Right Land Number 01 of 1985 constitutes state land. However, although the court decision has provided normative and judicial legal certainty, legal certainty from the perspective of land administration law has not yet been fully realized, as it has not been followed by administrative actions in the form of state land designation and registration of the land as State-Owned Property. Therefore, an integrative legal construction through land administration and state asset management mechanisms is required to ensure that the utilization of the land for public purposes, particularly as the Sofifi Port, is supported by clear legal status and provides legal protection for all parties involved.
Downloads
References
Arifin, S. (2019). Reformasi administrasi pertanahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 10(1).
Bakri, M. (2007). Hak menguasai negara dalam perspektif produk legislasi pertanahan. UB Press.
Boedi Harsono. (2005). Hukum agraria Indonesia. Djambatan.
Buitelaar, E., & Sorel, N. (2010). Between the rule of law and the quest for control: Legal certainty in the Dutch planning system. Land Use Policy, 27(3). (Mengutip pemikiran Utrecht).
Desinta, P. G. S., Padang, B. H., et al. (2021). Rekonstruksi konsep “tanah terlantar” dalam UUPA: Implikasi terhadap pengelolaan HGU yang tidak produktif. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(1).
Elsura, A. H., & Lubis, S. D. (2024). Peralihan hak guna bangunan menjadi hak milik berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang hak pengelolaan, hak atas tanah, satuan rumah susun, dan pendaftaran tanah. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(2).
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, (24).
Ismaya, F. (2023). Implementasi hak pengelolaan pasca PP 18/2021. Jurnal Hukum Agunan, 4(2).
Lumban Batu, J., & Esther, J. (2025). Analysis of land dispute resolution in court: A case study at LDP Law Firm & Partners. International Journal of Law & Society, 2(2).
Mamonto, A. N., Lambonan, M. L., & Goni, C. J. J. G. (2025). Pengalihan hak guna bangunan menjadi hak milik berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang hak pengelolaan, hak atas tanah, satuan rumah susun, dan pendaftaran tanah. Lex Administratum, 13(3).
Maria, S. W. (2001). Kebijakan pertanahan antara regulasi dan implementasi. Kompas.
Maria, S. W. (2004). Tanah dalam perspektif hak ekonomi, sosial, dan budaya. Kompas.
Moniaga. (2017). Tanah, negara, dan hak asasi manusia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(3).
Muchsin. (2022). Penertiban tanah terlantar berdasarkan PP Nomor 20 Tahun 2021. Jurnal Hukum Agraria, 13(2).
Pratomo, A. E. (2021). Pengelolaan barang milik negara ditinjau dari asas legalitas dan akuntabilitas. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(2).
Radbruch, G. (2006). Legal philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Rahayu, T. D., Pujiwati, Y., & Rubiati, B. (2023). Kepastian hukum kepemilikan hak atas tanah setelah mengalami likuefaksi tanah. Jurnal Litra, 2(2).
Rasyid, M. (2024). The role of mediation in land dispute resolution. Journal of Indonesian Social and Society Research, 2(1).
Santoso, U. (2010). Pendaftaran dan peralihan hak atas tanah. Prenadamedia Group.
Sutedi, A. (2012). Hak tanggungan. Sinar Grafika.
Sutedi, A. (2018). Hukum aset negara dan pengadaan tanah. Sinar Grafika.
Suwandi, R. (2022). Regulatory gap in Indonesian land law. Journal of Legal Reform, 5(2).
Wibowo, A. (2023). Resolution of land disputes through mediation at the Sleman District Land Office. RELAE: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 15(1).
Yamin, M. (2012). Hukum jaminan. Alumni.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Risky Herduiva Pradana, Husen Alting, Siti Barora Sinay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
