Analisis Risiko Sosial pada Proyek Perumahan Terjangkau di Jawa Timur

Salsadila Audiary Samudra; Farida Rachmawati

doi:10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5585

Authors

Salsadila Audiary Samudra Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Farida Rachmawati Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5585

Keywords:

Affordable Housing, Social Risk, Power Interest Matrix, Probability Impact Matrix

Abstract

Indonesia is currently facing a housing ownership crisis, with a backlog that reached 12.7 million units in 2023. The rapid escalation of urban land prices, which has grown far faster than household income, has significantly reduced housing affordability, especially for low-income communities. As a response, the government has promoted subsidized housing programs; however, their implementation at the local level continues to encounter substantial challenges. Limited availability of urban land often forces projects into peripheral areas, potentially creating inequality in access to public facilities, employment opportunities, and basic urban services. These conditions generate various social risks that may undermine the sustainability of affordable housing developments. This study aims to identify key social risks in affordable housing projects and to determine appropriate mitigation actions across different project phases. The research adopts a literature review approach combined with secondary data analysis, utilizing the Power–Interest Matrix and the Probability–Impact Matrix as analytical tools. The results indicate a dynamic shift in stakeholders who possess high power and high interest at different stages of project development. During the construction phase, four major social risks were identified, whereas in the operational or property management phase, six social risks emerged as top priorities. High-level social risks were found to be a predictable outcome of imbalanced stakeholder power and interest relationships. Overall, the findings emphasize the critical role of Governments, Developers, and Contractors in proactively managing social risks. Preventive and corrective measures must use tailored communication and stakeholder engagement to reduce social risks and improve project success overall outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Mathiba, “Housing affordability challenges in developing countries,” Journal of Urban Studies, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 245–260, 2024.

S. Roitman and R. Recio, “Housing markets and urban inequality in emerging economies,” International Journal of Housing Policy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 321–339, 2020.

B. Silver, “Population growth and housing demand dynamics,” World Development, vol. 176, pp. 105–118, 2024.

E. Oikarinen, S. Peltola, and J. Vilmunen, “Price-to-income ratio as an indicator of housing affordability,” Housing Studies, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 823–842, 2023.

G. Galster and S. Ok Lee, “Affordable housing policy adaptation at local levels,” Urban Affairs Review, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1635–1662, 2021.

T. Kwofie, J. Afram, and A. Botchway, “Affordability benchmarks in housing project decision-making,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 04023102-1–04023102-12, 2024.

Y. Liu, M. van Nederveen, and M. Hertogh, “Understanding social risks in construction projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 958–970, 2016.

F. Rachmawati and A. Susilawati, “Stakeholder coordination in housing development projects,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 171, pp. 123–131, 2016.

S. Maqbool, S. Khan, and M. Umar, “Stakeholder management for project success,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2022.

A. Yu, Z. Shen, and H. Chan, “Stakeholder influence in construction projects,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 04018045-1–04018045-10, 2019.

M. Khan, M. R. Khalid, and M. A. Shah, “Stakeholder conflicts and project delays in construction,” Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 589–603, 2022.

M. Moghayedi, A. Windapo, and E. Ibem, “Stakeholder coordination and housing project performance,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1603–1622, 2021.

M. Jepma, L. Bressers, and M. van der Heijden, “Collaborative housing models and affordability outcomes,” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2025.

F. Rachmawati, T. Utomo, and D. S. Arumsari, “Public-private partnership strategies in housing projects,” Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 45–60, 2018.

D. S. Arumsari, F. Rachmawati, and T. Utomo, “Identifying challenges in public housing management using Delphi method,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 04023001-1–04023001-11, 2024.

M. E. Miles, G. Berens, and M. A. Weiss, Real Estate Development: Principles and Process, 5th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Urban Land Institute, 2015.

H. Stocker, P. DeMarco, and J. Ellis, “Power–interest matrix application in project management,” Project Management Journal, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 402–415, 2020.

A. Shams, N. Hassan, and R. Bakar, “Stakeholder mapping for sustainable construction,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 381, pp. 135–148, 2023.

PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 6th ed. Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project Management Institute, 2017.

A. Agarwal and V. Yadav, “Risk identification and assessment techniques in construction,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 894–905, 2020.