Integrasi RBV, RDT, DCT, dan SCT dalam Menjelaskan Disiplin dan Kinerja Karyawan PT Bridgestone

Rusman Rusman; Yayan Hendayana

doi:10.55681/sentri.v4i11.4922

Authors

Rusman Rusman Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Yayan Hendayana Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v4i11.4922

Keywords:

Firm Performance, Resource-Based View, Resource Dependency Theory, Dynamic Capabilities, Dependency Ratio, Social Cognitive Theory, , Work Discipline,, Motivation

Abstract

This study aims to integrate five major theoretical frameworks—Firm Performance Theory, Resource-Based View (RBV), Resource Dependency Theory (RDT), Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT), and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)—to explain employee performance at PT Bridgestone Tire Indonesia, Bekasi Plant, Cutting Department. By combining these frameworks, the study provides a comprehensive understanding of how organizational resources, environmental dependencies, adaptive capabilities, and social-cognitive mechanisms interact to shape work outcomes. Empirical data is drawn from Rusman (2025), who analyzed both the mediating role of work discipline and the moderating role of work motivation in influencing performance. The findings indicate that internal resources such as human capital, knowledge, and technical skills, as well as external resource dependencies, significantly impact work discipline and overall firm performance. Dynamic capabilities allow employees and the organization to adapt to changing conditions and optimize resource utilization effectively. In parallel, social cognitive factors—including self-efficacy, observational learning, and social reinforcement—play a critical role in shaping employee behavior and discipline. Moreover, work motivation strengthens the relationship between discipline and performance, suggesting that highly motivated employees are more likely to translate disciplined behavior into measurable performance outcomes. These results highlight that organizational excellence is not solely determined by material resources or structural factors but depends on a synergistic combination of systemic resource management, adaptive capabilities, and individual psychological engagement. The study underscores the importance of aligning motivational strategies, discipline management, and resource optimization to achieve sustainable high performance in competitive industrial settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Budiman, D., & Fadhilah, M. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Business and Society, 24(3), 421–439.

Farida, H., & Rachmad, R. (2024). Internal capabilities and innovation in industrial firms. Journal of Strategic Management Research, 14(2), 202–219.

Imbron, I., & Pamungkas, I. B. (2021). Human resource management for manufacturing adaptation. Widina Media Utama, 1(1), 20–33.

Akilie, A. H., Putra, R. B., Pratiwi, N., & Finis, H. (2025). The effect of reward and motivation on employee performance with discipline as mediation. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Pendidikan, 4(2), 12–25.

Akilie, A. H., Putra, R. B., Pratiwi, N., & Finis, H. (2025). The effect of reward and work motivation on employee performance with work discipline as a mediating variable. Journal of Management and Education, 4(1), 55–68.

Hertanto, A., Rachmawati, I., Kurniawan, H., & Handayani, N. (2023). Relationship between safety climate and safety behavior in Company X in Indonesia. Safety, 9(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040089

Riptono, R., As’ad, M., & Hafriansyah, M. R. (2022). Safety and performance in manufacturing. Transparansi: Jurnal Ilmiah, 2(2), 283–293.

Sudarnaya, I. K., Dwi, K., & Adnyani, P. (2023). Occupational safety and discipline during pandemic. Asian HR Journal, 7(1), 50–68.

Handayani, N., & Nugraha, P. (2023). Dynamic learning and adaptive performance. Asian Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 199–214.

Fadilla, A. (2022). Safety culture and organizational discipline. Jurnal Manajemen Industri, 3(2), 112–129.

Jo, H., Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2025). The impact of recognition, fairness, and leadership on employee engagement and performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.11717283

Imran, U. D., Ghazwan, M. F., & Firmansyah. (2025). Recognition and appreciation effects on employee motivation. Economics and Digital Business Review, 6(1), 1–18.

Sopiyah, S., & Wahdiniawati, A. (2023). Training, motivation, and discipline on performance. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen Bisnis, 3(2), 176–184.

Mulyanto, M., & Nawangsari, L. C. (2020). Motivation, satisfaction, and compensation on work discipline. Ekonomi & Bisnis, 19(1), 1–10.

Setianingrum, C., Widjajani, S., & Utomo, A. S. (2025). The effect of discipline and work environment on employee performance and job satisfaction as mediation variables. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 6(2), 557–565.

Sujimah, E. (2025). The mediating role of work discipline in work environment and compensation effects on productivity. Organization and Human Development Studies, 5(2), 45–56.

Rajâa, O., El Allam, A., & El Amrani, R. (2025). Social exchange theory and firm performance. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2475983. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2475983

Solehati, D. T., Hasnawati, R., Putri, S. S., & Hendayana, Y. (2024). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja, motivasi kerja, dan disiplin kerja terhadap produktivitas karyawan pada PT XYZ. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(1), 328–338.

Apsari, C., & Syarif, R. (2022). Pengaruh motivasi kerja, disiplin, dan lingkungan terhadap kinerja. Jurnal Manajemen Strategis, 5(2), 8–15.

Dipang, L. (2021). Human resource development for performance improvement. Journal of Organizational Growth, 2(1), 88–101.

Nufuf, G. H., Riyadi, S., & Lestari, P. (2025). Analysis of motivation, competence, compensation and work discipline on performance: A SEM–PLS study. Journal of Public Research and Social Policy, 4(1), 55–72.

Nufuf, G. H., Riyadi, S., & Lestari, P. (2025). Motivation, competence, compensation and work discipline on performance. Journal of Public Research and Social Policy, 4(1), 55–72.

Pramesti, D. A., Wahjono, S. I., & Surabaya, U. M. (2024). The influence of safety and motivation on discipline. Journal of Human Capital Studies, 3(1), 44–60.

Siagian, P. G. (2020). Work health and safety influence on performance. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 1(10), 738–744.

Sindy, F. P., & Eko, N. F. (2023). Mediating discipline in safety and performance. Co-Value: Jurnal Ekonomi, 14(1), 1–15.

Sapu, G. R., Foeh, J. E. H. J., & Manafe, H. A. (2023). Leadership, motivation, and environment on performance. Journal of Human Resource Review, 1(3), 144–158.

Nurmala, P. I., Suwandi, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Peer assessment and productivity. Linguistics and Education Journal, 1(2), 60–74.

Yam, J. H., & Taufik, R. (2021). Quantitative research hypothesis. Perspektif: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 3(2), 96–102.

Rusman. (2025). Peran disiplin kerja memediasi pengaruh motivasi kerja dan program K3 terhadap kinerja karyawan di PT Bridgestone Tire Indonesia Bekasi Plant Departemen Cutting (Tesis Magister). STIE Mulia Pratama.