Desain Kurikulum PAUD untuk Guru Non-Kependidikan di Wilayah 3T : Kajian Literatur Berbasis Design Thinking

Authors

  • Kharisma Caisar Mitania Syaumi Setlight Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Haryono Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i1.5591

Keywords:

ECE Curriculum Design, 3T Regions, Non-Education-Trained Teachers, Design Thinking, Literature Review

Abstract

Disparities in the quality of Early Childhood Education (ECE) services in underdeveloped, frontier, and outermost (3T) regions are often understood primarily as issues of limited facilities and infrastructure. However, a review of various studies indicates that a more fundamental problem lies in curriculum designs that are not fully grounded in the social, cultural, and professional realities of educators in these regions. Much of the existing ECE curriculum literature assumes the availability of professionally trained teachers with formal pedagogical backgrounds, rendering it less relevant to community-based ECE programs managed by non-education-trained teachers. This article presents a critical literature review of studies addressing contextual ECE curriculum design in 3T regions through a Design Thinking approach. The review is conducted using thematic analysis of national and international journal articles, academic books, and relevant conference proceedings. The synthesis of the literature reveals that Design Thinking offers a human-centered framework that enables curricula to be developed in an empathetic, participatory, and locally adaptive manner. Nevertheless, discussions on the integration of this approach into ECE curriculum design in 3T regions remain relatively limited. This article emphasizes the importance of developing a theoretical framework for ECE curricula grounded in field realities that is not only contextual but also positions non-education-trained teachers as key actors in the curriculum design process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperCollins.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Depdiknas. (2005). Pedoman pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan anak usia dini. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Hurlock, E. B. (2011). Perkembangan anak (Terjemahan). Erlangga.

Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Ablex Publishing.

Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design thinking: Understand–improve–apply. Springer.

Rusmann, A., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2022). Design thinking in early childhood education and care: A literature review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31, 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100360

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yalçın, S. (2022). Design thinking model in early childhood education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 20(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X221102345

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Setlight, K. C. M. S., & Haryono, H. (2026). Desain Kurikulum PAUD untuk Guru Non-Kependidikan di Wilayah 3T : Kajian Literatur Berbasis Design Thinking. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 7(1), 1070–1075. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i1.5591