Konsep Kurikulum Alternatif Pendidikan Nonformal di Daerah Terpencil: Kajian Literatur Berbasis Pengembangan Kurikulum Model Taba
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i1.5590Keywords:
Alternative Curriculum, Nonformal Education, Taba Model, Remote Areas, Curriculum PolicyAbstract
National curriculum policies in Indonesia are designed to ensure educational quality standards; however, their uniform and centralized implementation often overlooks the social, cultural, and geographical contexts of communities, particularly in remote areas. This condition results in formal curricula that are less relevant and do not fully address the learning needs of local communities. Nonformal education has emerged as an alternative space that enables the development of more flexible and contextual curricula. This article aims to critically and descriptively examine the concept of alternative curricula in nonformal education in remote areas through a qualitative literature review, integrating the Taba Curriculum Development Model as an analytical framework. Research data were obtained from key reference books, national and international journal articles, and education policy documents. Data analysis was conducted using qualitative thematic analysis with a descriptive–interpretative and critical approach. The findings indicate that alternative curricula in nonformal education emphasize flexibility, local relevance, community participation, and empowerment-oriented learning. The integration of the Taba Model demonstrates that curriculum development based on local needs can be carried out in a systematic and reflective manner. This study underscores that alternative curricula function not only as a pedagogical solution but also as a theoretical critique of national curriculum policies that have not yet fully ensured educational equity for communities in remote areas.
Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Freire, P. (2005). Pendidikan kaum tertindas. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner. New York: Routledge.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W. M., & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sudjana, D. (2004). Pendidikan nonformal: Wawasan, sejarah perkembangan, filsafat, teori pendukung, serta asas. Bandung: Falah Production.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2012). Kurikulum pendidikan nasional. Jakarta: Kompas.
Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(Karya klasik untuk pembanding model kurikulum rasional–teknis)
UNESCO. (2012). Youth and skills: Putting education to work. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2016). Community-based learning for sustainable development. Hamburg: UIL.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Oktin Kristina Hutapea, Budiyono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








