Law Enforcement Policy in the Case of Double L Pill Abuse by Adolescents: A Study of the Ponorogo District Court Decision

Authors

  • Refi Nur Eka Febriana Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Ponorogo, Indonesia
  • Aries Isnandar Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Ponorogo, Indonesia
  • Ferry Irawan Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Ponorogo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i1.5268

Keywords:

Double L pills , misuse of hard drugs, Article 435 of the Health Law, legal certainty, justice, utility, juvenile rehabilitation

Abstract

The misuse of Double L pills among adolescents poses a serious threat to public health, moral values, and the future of the younger generation, including in Ponorogo Regency. This research analyzes Court Decision No. 75/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Png using a normative juridical approach to examine the judges’ legal considerations in proving the elements of the criminal act, the application of Article 435 of Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, and the imposition of sanctions on juvenile offenders from the perspectives of legal certainty, justice, and social utility. The study reveals that the panel of judges successfully proved all elements of the offense in a lawful and convincing manner, making the application of Article 435 appropriate and reflective of strong legal certainty. The defendant was sentenced to 2 years and 6 months imprisonment, with the defendant’s young age and cooperative attitude considered as mitigating factors. Nevertheless, the aspects of substantive justice and utility, particularly regarding the guidance and rehabilitation of juvenile offenders, remain less than optimal. The research concludes that stronger collaboration among law enforcement agencies, local government, educational institutions, and the community is required through intensive legal education, early prevention, and recovery-oriented rehabilitation programs. Such measures will ensure that law enforcement is not merely retributive but also preventive and educative for the younger generation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfarez, D. R., Akbar, M. G. G., & Abas, M. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak sebagai Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika dalam Kerangka Hukum Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Supremasi, 33–46.

Amanda, J. P., & Dewi, S. (2024). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Peredaran Sediaan Farmasi Tanpa Izin Edar. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 7(2), 547–566.

Amalina, R. A. (2024). Permasalahan Penjualan Obat Keras Jenis Prekursor oleh Apotek di Kota Samarinda. Dedikasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial, Hukum, Budaya, 25(1), 33–48.

Andi Lulu Isvany, A., et al. (2024). Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia: Tantangan, Dampak, serta Upaya Perlindungan bagi Generasi Muda. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 7(1), 109–114.

Annisa, S. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen terhadap Tindakan Apoteker yang dengan Sengaja Menyalurkan Obat Keras Golongan G tanpa Resep Dokter. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 387–396.

Butarbutar, J. M. (2024). Penjatuhan Pidana Maksimal bagi Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum dalam Perspektif Tujuan Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(1).

Fatahillah, K., Rahman, S., & Badaru, B. (2022). Efektivitas Pemidanaan dalam Penanganan Perkara Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Journal of Lex Generalis, 3(4), 743–757.

Firnawati, & Yunus, A. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Peredaran Obat Tanpa Izin Edar. Jembatan Hukum, 1(4), 194–202.

Hadi, M. D., Thalib, H., & Qamar, N. (2025). Tinjauan atas Keyakinan Hakim terhadap Alat Bukti dalam Pemutusan Perkara Pidana. Legal Dialogica, 1(1), 1–11.

Imra, J. M., Yusuf, M., & Pardede, R. (2025). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Menghambat Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Perzinaan. Lancang Kuning Law Journal, 2(1), 1–7.

Juliana, A. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Usaha atas Peredaran Kosmetik Tanpa Izin Edar. Duta Hukum, 1(2), 41–52

Khairunnisa, P., & Rasji. (2024). Tinjauan terhadap Penerapan Sanksi Kumulatif bagi Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum. Ranah Research, 6(4), 990–1001.

Pramita, S. A. (2025). Implementasi Restorative Justice dalam Penologi Modern sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2), 899–912.

Rivanie, S. S., et al. (2022). Perkembangan Berbagai Teori mengenai Tujuan Pemidanaan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(2), 176–188.

Yudhayana, S. W., & Aziz, A. S. (2024). Urgensi Kesadaran Hukum dalam Dinamika Sosial Masyarakat. Legalitas, 9(1), 79–96.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Febriana, R. N. E., Isnandar, A., & Irawan, F. (2026). Law Enforcement Policy in the Case of Double L Pill Abuse by Adolescents: A Study of the Ponorogo District Court Decision. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 7(1), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i1.5268