The Effect of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) Disclosure on Audit Quality with Firm Size and Industry Complexity as Moderating Variables (An Empirical Study on Manufacturing Companies Listed On the IDX in 2020–2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i1.4678Keywords:
ESG, Audit Quality, Firm Size, Industrial Complexity, Manufacturing FirmsAbstract
Weak or non-transparent ESG reports regarding governance structure and internal control policies can signal to auditors a high inherent risk of control failure, which in turn increases the risk of material misstatement due to fraud. This study aims to examine the effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure on audit quality, as well as the effect of company size and industry complexity as moderating variables in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2020 to 2024. The research sample was determined using purposive sampling. The study uses a causal associative method with a quantitative approach and panel data regression analysis. The statistical data processing and analysis were carried out using STATA statistical software. The results showed that disclosure of environmental aspects had no effect on audit quality. In contrast, social and governance aspects have a negative effect on audit quality. This finding indicates that the higher the social and governance score of a company, the auditor tends to consider the audit risk lower, thus reducing the need for additional independent audits. Simultaneously, social and governance are also proven to reduce audit quality. Firm size is not shown to moderate the relationship between ESG and audit quality, as both large and small firms may experience an exaggerated perception of high ESG reputation. However, industry complexity is shown to positively moderate the relationship between social and governance aspects and audit quality. In complex industries, despite high ESG scores, the demand for rigorous audit oversight still increases due to the high potential reporting risks. This study provides an empirical contribution in understanding the dynamics of ESG influence on audit in Indonesia's manufacturing sector, and suggests the importance of considering operational complexity factors in designing an effective audit oversight system.
Downloads
References
ACFE. (2024). Association of Certified Fraud Examiners The Nations Occupational Fraud 2024 :A Report To The Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 1–106.
Alwardat, Y. (2019). Disclosure Quality and its Impact on Financial Reporting Quality, Audit Quality, and Investors’ Perceptions of the Quality of Financial Reporting: A Literature Review. Accounting and Finance Research, 8(3), 201. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v8n3p201
Amaya, N., López-Santamaría, M., Acosta, Y. A. C., & Hinestroza, M. P. G. (2021). A step-by-step method to classify corporate sustainability practices based on the Signaling Theory. MethodsX, 8, 101538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101538
Ariyanto, T., & Fanani, Z. (2020). The Influence of Social Ties, Audit Tenure and Audit Fee towards Audit Quality. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 06(10), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.31695/ijasre.2020.33902
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. In Indonesia Chapter #111 (Vol. 53, Issue 9). https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/
Baldini, M., Maso, L. D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). Role of country-and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of business ethics, 150(1), 79-98.
Chopra, S. S., Senadheera, S. S., Dissanayake, P. D., Withana, P. A., Chib, R., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2024). Navigating the challenges of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting: The path to broader sustainable development. Sustainability, 16(2), 606.
Dang, C., (Frank) Li, Z., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006
Mulyadi, D., Puspita, E., Auliarrahma, N. I., Shelvira, S. A., Kintara, I., & Fattah, M. S. F. A. (2024). Regional autonomy in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities in sustainable development in the era of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(2).
Ramli, Syafruddin, Saputra, E., Suliwati, D., Karimuddin, Khaidir, M. H. A. N. S., & Jahja, A. S. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Rake Sarasin (Issue Maret). https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=O-B3eJYAAAAJ&hl=en
Sekaran, U., & Roger Bougie. (2017). Buku Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis (Edisi 6). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Wong, W. K., Teh, B. H., & Hooi, T. S. (2023). The influence of external stakeholders on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting: Toward a conceptual framework for ESG disclosure. Foresight and STI Governance, 17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marsel Pasaribu, Ricky Agusiady, Fitriana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








