Defense (Noodweer) As the Reason for the Elimination of the Crime of Persecution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v6i3.4138Keywords:
Crime, Persecution, NoodweerAbstract
Forced defense (noodweer) is one of the justifications in criminal law that can eliminate criminal liability for an act that is basically unlawful, but is carried out to defend oneself from an unlawful attack. The regulation regarding noodweer still often causes debate in judicial practice, especially in cases of abuse. This study aims to examine the regulation of forced defense in Indonesian criminal law and analyze its application in cases of criminal abuse. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, through analysis of secondary legal materials. The case study in case No. 101/Pid.B/2024/PN.Snj shows that the judge acquitted the defendant because he was proven to have committed a forced defense. The elements of defense that can eliminate criminal liability include an unlawful attack, actions carried out proportionally and subsidiary, not accompanied by malicious intent, and carried out at the place and time of the incident. These results show the importance of a proper understanding of the concept of noodweer in the criminal justice process.
Downloads
References
Agung, A. A. G., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pelaku pembunuhan begal atas dasar pembelaan terpaksa. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(1), 2–7.
Arto, M. (2004). Praktek perkara perdata pada Pengadilan Agama (Cet. V). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Effendi, T. (2014). Dasar-dasar hukum acara pidana: Perkembangan dan pembaharuannya di Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press.
Gea, R. A., dkk. (2016). Penerapan noodweer (pembelaan terpaksa) dalam putusan hakim/putusan pengadilan. USU Law Journal, 4(4), 142.
Hakim, L. (2020). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Sleman: Deepublish.
Hamdan, M. (2014). Alasan penghapus pidana: Teori dan studi kasus. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Hamzah, A. (2012). Asas-asas hukum pidana di Indonesia dan perkembangannya. Jakarta: PT. Sofmedia.
Husin, K., & Husin, B. R. (2016). Sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Insani, N. (2019). Hilangnya pidana terhadap seseorang yang melakukan pembelaan diri menurut Pasal 49 ayat 1 dan 2 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pamulang.
Kusuma, N. P. K. N., dkk. (2023). Pembelaan terpaksa (noodweer) sebagai penghapus tindak pidana penganiayaan yang menyebabkan kematian (Studi Putusan Perkara Pidana Nomor 115/Pid.B/2021/PN.Stb). Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 5(1), 22.
Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, F. T. (2014). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Mulyadi, L. (2010). Seraut wajah putusan hakim dalam hukum acara pidana Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Prakoso, D. (1985). Kedudukan justisiabel dalam KUHAP. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Prodjodikoro, W. (1989). Asas-asas hukum pidana di Indonesia. Bandung:
Simanjuntak, N. (2009). Acara pidana Indonesia dalam sirkus hukum. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vincent Desranta, Kusbianto, Ariman Sitompul

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








